View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
September 11, 2014updated 23 Aug 2022 6:44pm

Why police were wrong to warn public they could be committing a crime by watching American journalist beheading

By Cleland Thom

The Metropolitan Police were wrong to warn people who watched the video of the beheading of an American journalist that they could be committing a crime.

I blogged last month about how the advice targeted the wrong people and lacked common sense.

And closer examination shows that neither the Terrorism Acts of 2000 and 2006, nor the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, make viewing "extremist material" a criminal offence.

This didn’t stop the Met issuing a press release stating: "We would like to remind the public that viewing, downloading or disseminating extremist material within the UK may constitute an offence under terrorism legislation."

The 2006 Act doesn’t actually mention "extremist material". It covers "terrorist publications" – but these do not include TV material. And in any case, a material can only be classed as "a terrorist publication" if it …"induces or encourages the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism".

Had the Met wanted to throw its weight about, it might have been more convincing to warn UK TV stations and digital platforms not to broadcast the video. The 2006 Act does give police the power to prosecute people who …"provide a service to others that enables them to obtain, read, listen to or look at such a [terrorist] publication."

But even then, it would be hard to prove that the execution video encouraged acts of terrorism.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

So either the Met weren’t familiar with terrorism legislation. Or they wanted to intimidate or mislead the public, for whatever the reason.

Cleland Thom runs online media law refresher courses <https://www.ctjt.biz/course/c/19/t/media-law-refresher-course>

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network