Why I'm proud to be a member of the #scummedia

A rather nasty anti-journalist tendency which has been simmering on social media manifested itself on the streets of London this week in the form of physical attacks on reporters.

An Australian Nine News reporter Sophie Walsh was grabbed live on air, another was chased down the street, and outside Downing Street journalists were hounded by protesters perversely shouting “fuck the Daily Mail”.

We were lucky that a freelance photographer was not more seriously hurt after being bottled and knocked out. He said there were “a lot of people baying for blood, saying ‘he’s Daily Mail, he deserved it'”.

Would you pay a Spotify-style subscription of £10 a month for access to most premium consumer news websites?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

It seems that pent up frustrations felt during three long months of lockdown are erupting into incidents of shooting the messengers who have been charged with sharing so much bad news.

How ironic that protesters at a Black Lives Matter protest should single out the Daily Mail – the paper which fought for years to secure justice for Stephen Lawrence, the young man killed in 1993 in the UK’s most notorious racially motivated attack.

The paper provokes visceral hatred from those on the left because of its role helping to secure Britain’s exit from the European Union with a strategy that at times blurred the lines between journalism and propaganda.

But former editor Paul Dacre also risked his own liberty with a 1997 front-page that photographed and named Stephen’s alleged killers and called them “murderers”.

The financial risk of being sued for libel was tangible, but the story was also potentially contempt of court which is a criminal offence for which the editor is personally liable.

Journalism is almost by definition imperfect. It is the first draft of history, produced to deadline with limited resources to the best of our abilities.

Yes journalists get things wrong (I felt it important that Press Gazette point out the charge of hypocrisy that our industry left itself open to when journalists breached social distancing rules in the clamour to interview and photograph Dominic Cummings).

But overall this pandemic has highlighted more clearly than ever before the vital role of the so-called #scummedia in holding government to account during the most perilous period our country has faced since the Second World War.

The best examples are highlighted here by Press Gazette in our Coronavirus Journalism Excellence Survey. If you would like to recommend any examples of great journalism during the pandemic please to so here before the final deadline of Sunday night.

They include the vital role of journalists in:

  • highlighting PPE shortages
  • exposing the hypocrisy of leaders and advisers flouting the social distancing rules they helped impose
  • revealing the extent of the death toll ripping through care homes
  • and dissecting the mistakes which have led to the UK having possibly the highest per capita death rate from coronavirus of any country in the world.

Journalists have done all this while, in many cases, taking pay cuts and picking up extra work from colleagues who have been furloughed.

They’ve also universally taken great pains to ensure the information they share is based on evidence and not hearsay.

And journalists have played a huge role binding communities together by highlighting the keyworkers who have kept the country going – especially at a local level. Without the news media it is doubtful that Captain Tom’s fundraising efforts would have been anything like as successful.

In many ways the growth of online media has democratised journalism and made it more accountable. We are all probably far better informed than ever before as a result.

But the total lack of regulation and accountability for the UK’s biggest media companies – the online platforms – has allowed toxic misinformation to spread and I fear the current attacks on journalists are a symptom of this.

Based on our industry’s performance during the coronavirus crisis I for one am proud to be part of what some call the #scummedia.

SIGN UP HERE FOR

PRESS GAZETTE DAILY

Our free daily round-up of the biggest news about the world of news

Comments

4 thoughts on “Why I'm proud to be a member of the #scummedia”

  1. Dominic,

    Your take in this op-ed is as disappointing as it is disingenuous, and I’m frankly baffled by it.

    The fact that you have to go all the way back to a February 1997 headline from the Daily Mail – a paper singular and unique in its one-off sympathy towards one black British person, among the scores it has vilified over the years – tells its own story.

    For this single story you have proffered in the Daily Mail’s defence and its apparent love for the minority ethnic population, there are hundreds more in which they have fomented anti-black and anti-immigrant sentiment, misogyny and prurient voyeurism – very often the byword for a Daily Mail story.

    As a fellow journalist, I too am dismayed by rising anti-press sentiment – and the apparent willingness of various governments to exploit it.

    But the Daily Mail in particular has played a major part in arousing such reactions displayed by the public at the moment.

    The Mail, in particular, plays fast and loose with visceral emotion, primeval instinct and partisan politicking dressed up as fact – and so should not be surprised when this spills over into rage during such times as we live in currently.

    Survey upon annual survey places journalism further down the comparative trust index as the years roll by. It’s been awhile coming, but it happens to be reaching its zenith as we live through the effects of a global pandemic and the subsequent exposure of all kinds of faultlines across our society.

    One of those faultlines brought into sharp relief is the racial injustice persisting across the world, and in this country in particular.

    To use the ‘Murderers’ headline as some sort of proof of the Daily Mail’s multicultural credentials – at a time when the relative blindness and deafness to racial injustice and systemic racism by our media and mainstream society at large is being exposed – is extremely crass.

    This week you published these words from ITV News’ head of newsgathering:
    “It shouldn’t take a tragedy for media to take racial inequality seriously.”

    And yet, here we are, and it has taken a tragedy.

    In a publication established to champion the good work that journalists do, I’m afraid this editorial piece falls woefully short.

1 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 − three =