View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
September 21, 2011

(Video) Reuters hacking debate: Are editors ‘farting against the thunderstorm’ if they think they can avoid state regulation?

By Dominic Ponsford1

Leading national newspaper editors last night insisted that the system of press self-regulation can be reformed rather than scrapped.

But, as former BBC chairman of governors Sir Christopher Bland put it at the same event,  editors should not underestimate the pressure for change. After listening to their pleas that the industry can put its own house in order he said: “It is useless to fart against the thunderstorm”. 

The Reuters Press We Deserve event, chaired by Sir Harold Evans, brought together a stellar line-up of journalism luminaries to discuss how the industry can recover from the hacking scandal. They included Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger, Times editor James Harding, Financial Times editor Lionel Barber and Economist editor John Micklethwait.

But absent from the panel, and from the hall, were any voices from the tabloid end of the industry.

As Press Gazette has found, the likes of the Mail titles, the Mirror and The Sun are so far reluctant to get involved in a public debate about the future of the industry post hacking.

In my view they need to wake-up fast to the fact that we are now in a new era where they have to open up to a new level of public scrutiny if the journalism industry is to save itself from state control.

Media commentator Roy Greenslade suggested that a sinister cabal comprising Associated Newspapers, News International and Telegraph Media Group secretly pulls the strings of the PCC.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The PCC does nothing to dispell this by the way it has gone about the reform process so far – which so far appears to have involved discussion between editors and owners conducted behind closed doors (if is has gone on at all). It needs to open up a public consultation on reform and involve the likes of the NUJ and the targets of media excesses in an open process if it is to save itself.

Here are some of the highlights from last night’s event. A detailed written report will (with pics) will be appearing in the October edition of Press Gazette magazine.

Labour Peer Bernard Donoughue:

“Because of phone-hacking the present situation cannot persist – you should not underestimate the damage that has been done and therefore there must be a change.. We have to look at how we can make self regulation work…I think it must have the powers to fine and punish, it must be conducted by independents and you can get I am sure a statutory backing.”

Financial Times editor Lionel Barber:

“Newspapers are dying in this country, they are struggling. This is an existential problem… We have to both innovate and embrace this new media, we have to think about how regulation will affect the new and old media.

“The freedom for us to publish is consttantly being challenged by well-heeled oligarchs who shall remain nameless with deep pockets who are bringnig libel actions or people who are invoking some right to confidentiality regarding financial information…”

Times lawyer Pia Sarma had some interesting insight into the Met Police’s extraordinary bid to force Guardian journalist Amelia Hill to disclose her sources for a stories about the police investigation into the News of the World. The debate took place hours before the Met abandoned its bid under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and the Official Secrets Act.

“The introduction of a production order into a production order under PACE is unprecedented and it is an extraordinary step in the climate we have now. Under the relevant legislation you can raise a public interest defence and it seems that they have worked backwards here, they have trumped that public interest from the outset by introducing the Official Secrets Act and making the crime so heinous that you can’t possible go in there and expect to win.”

Topics in this article : , ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network