View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
March 21, 2013

UK plan for statute-backed press regulator draws condemnation from around the world

By Darren Boyle

Plans for a state-backed press regulator have been condemned internationally by groups dedicated to freedom of speech. 

Campaigners fear that authoritarian regimes will use the British model as a precedent to clamp down on their own media.

Phenyo Butale, of the South African Freedom of Expression Institute, claimed: “African governments have shown they are uncomfortable with free press acting as a watchdog, holding them to account. A move to statutory regulation in the UK would really be a gift for them.”

The Privy Council will present the controversial plans to the Queen at their next meeting on 8 May. If signed, a state-recognised regulator could be operational within 12 months.

So far, only The Independent has announced that it will accept the deal that was agreed in Labour leader Ed Miliband’s office between the three main political parties on Sunday night/Monday morning this week.

The Sun this morning continued its strong line against regulation by claiming their budget coverage has been “approved by the Ministry of Truth”.

The New York Times addressed the issue in a strongly-worded editorial condemning the plan.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The paper’s editorial board said the Royal Charter would “chill free speech and threaten the survival of small publishers and Internet sites".

“But such misdeeds are far better handled as violations of existing British criminal and civil laws, which already provide ways to prosecute and sue reporters for defamation or hacking.

“The kind of press regulations proposed by British politicians would do more harm than good because an unfettered press is essential to democracy.”

It concluded: “It would be perverse if regulations enacted in response to this scandal ended up stifling the kind of hard hitting investigative journalism that brought it to light in the first place.”

In Somalia, Mohammed Ibrahim of the Somali Union of Journalists told The Times: “It is alarming that the British Government is regulating the freedom of its press.” According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 49 reporters have been killed in the country since 1992."

Broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby and chairman of the Index of Censorship warned of potential future political interference: “The two-thirds block on any changes to the royal charter could be abused in the future – not least when today’s emerging consensus shows that the parties can come together in both houses to agree on press regulation.”

This morning the New Statesman joined the growing opposition to the proposed Royal Charter claiming it is “regulation designed to suit politicians.”

The Spectator has already said it will not sign up the new Royal Charter-backed press regulator.

The NS said in an editorial: "The New Statesman, which has an ever-growing website and digital presence, currently does not see its interests served by regulation designed to suit politicians, nor by a revanche regime cooked up for the comfort of newspaper barons. Until a better plan is put forward we reserve our right to continue publishing 'news-related material' in print and online without deference to either of those parties."

According to The Times, parenting website Mumsnet has asked the Government for an exclusion from the new press regulation regime.

But the exemplary damages amendment passed on Monday suggests that sites such as Mumsnet almost certainly would be at risk of paying exemplary damages in libel trials if they refuse to join the new regulator.

The bill defines publishers as those who produce "news-related material, produced by multiple authors and under editorial control".

Advert published by the Free Speech Network, a campaign group formed by the major UK news publishers:

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network