Dismiss

Two-thirds of Brits worried about 'fake news' but only 15 per cent prepared to pay for trusted journalism

Brits are more worried than their European neighbours about “fake news”, but are the least likely to pay for verified journalism, according to a new Yougov poll.

Almost two thirds (64 per cent) of UK respondents said they were concerned about fake news, higher than in Italy (63 per cent), Germany (56 per cent) the Netherlands (57 per cent), and Sweden (48 per cent).

The average across the five countries surveyed was 59 per cent.

The survey into attitudes towards fake news was commissioned by digital magazine subscription app Readly. It surveyed 7,603 people in total.

Brits were more likely to believe they are being frequently exposed to fake news, with 63 per cent saying they saw such content often or very often. In Germany just 28 per cent said the same.

Brits were also most likely to think fake news will increase in the next two or three years, with 70 per cent saying so. Just three per cent said they thought it would decrease and 14 per cent said the amount of fake news would stay the same.

But asked whether they would be willing to now pay for verified journalism, defined as content that has been fact-checked by the publisher, to avoid fake news, just 15 per cent of Brits said yes.

Survey question: Are you willing to pay for verified journalism to avoid the risk of consuming “fake news”? Verified means that content is fact-checked by the publisher. Picture: You Gov

Ten per cent said they already are, while five per cent said they would be willing to start immediately.

Fourteen per cent said they may pay for trusted journalism if the spread of fake news increases, but 40 per cent said they are avoiding the risk of fake news in “other ways”.

These may include fact-checking themselves, which almost half (48 per cent) of Brits said they do to check whether a news story is trustworthy.

But more than a fifth (22 per cent) said “there is no way of knowing” if they should trust a story.

Survey question: What factors would assure you that a news story is trustworthy? Please choose the three most important. Picture: You Gov

Readly’s UK managing director Ranj Begley said the results showed consumers are “wising up” to fake news “and turning to established content from trusted sources”.

“The research shows that readers are putting intelligent measures in place to filter out the noise,” she went on.

Picture: Google Maps

Comments

2 thoughts on “Two-thirds of Brits worried about 'fake news' but only 15 per cent prepared to pay for trusted journalism”

  1. I think the pollsters have to define what respondents consider to be “fake news” otherwise the responses are meaningless. In the Trump-Johnson era, fact-checked journalism is frequently decried as fake news, while falsified propaganda is sold as fact. Why would readers be willing to pay for good journalism if they believe that’s the very kind of information that’s faked in the first place? I personally know people who are convinced that the BBC and The Guardian are peddling false information according to a secret agenda, while they believe the YouTube videos by conspiracy theorists that they watch every day are solid fact.

  2. Not too sure what this exercise is designed to support. Most fact checking organisations as corporately owned media are merely fronts for disseminating a US/NATO perspective, as publishers will probably source from these organisations, is it about preventing sloppy journalism or ensuring ours is the only voice you should believe? Given the intensity of ‘protecting the public’, it’s probably the latter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *