View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
November 15, 2001updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Times launches Loutchansky appeal

By Press Gazette

A newspaper’s right to publish back copies on its website for the benefit of the public is at the heart of The Times’s libel battle against Russian businessman Dr Gregori Loutchansky, a court heard this week.

It has "a social and moral duty" to protect its internet archive and not to delete articles that have been published, the newspaper claimed in a written submission.

To delete material would be "to airbrush history in a manner worthy of Stalin’s Soviet union", it said.

The Times this week launched a challenge at the Court of Appeal against the 11 May High Court ruling of Mr Justice Gray in the case, which centres on findings that the paper libelled Dr Loutchansky in articles accusing him of being the boss of a major Russian criminal organisation involved in money-laundering.

Among other things The Times is appealing against the judge’s rejection of a defence of qualified privilege. The paper claims that the articles concerned matters of the greatest interest and importance to the public and that the defence should have been allowed by the judge.

Opening the appeal for The Times, Lord Lester QC told the court headed by Master of the Rolls, Lord Phillips, that the issues under appeal raised the question of the balance between the constitutional right to freedom of expression and protection of an individual’s right to his reputation.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

"The right to free speech must not be unnecessarily chilled by defamation law," he said.

He said that the fact a paper was unable to prove the truth of what it alleged did not mean that the allegations were false, and still less that the press should be prevented or deterred from communicating the information and opinions obtained from app-arently reliable sources such as police and intelligence sources.

Lord Lester also argued that the defence of qualified privilege should be extended to cover internet archives.

Desmond Browne QC, acting for Dr Loutchansky, described The Times’s submission as "startling". "It is a newspaper of record because it is meant to record truth, not to perpetuate falsity."

The hearing, in which judgment is expected to be reserved, continues.

By Roger Pearson

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network