View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
November 7, 2016

Sun’s decision to pay damages and retract stories about ‘threesome’ celebrity a ‘massive climbdown’

By Gustaf Kilander

The Sun on Sunday has agreed to pay damages to a celebrity only referred to as ‘PJS’, who won the right to keep his name out of a “kiss and tell” story at the Supreme Court in May this year.

The celebrity took legal action after The Sun sought to reveal his involvement in a three-way sexual encounter. The Supreme Court ruled that there was no public in interest in making the information public, and also cited concerns about the couple’s children.

News Group Newspapers has agreed to pay a “specified sum” for costs and damages and to not publish any material identifying the celebrity.

In court documents PJS and his spouse, referred to as ‘YMA’, were described as “well-known individuals in the entertainment business”.

 

Press reform campaign group Hacked Off said The Sun’s decision to end the long-running litigation with a payout and retraction was a “massive climbdown”

Hacked Off executive director Evan Harris said: “Once the Sun’s spurious public interest justification was thrown out by the High Court, it stood liable for the privacy intrusion.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

“Even if it had then been allowed to publish – on the basis of existing internet publication – it would have faced ‘exemplary damages’ for deliberately intruding on the privacy of people in order to generate profits from so doing.

“The real issue here, however, is what would happen to the everyday victims of press intrusion that Hacked Off works with – the vast majority of press victims, who do not have the deep pockets needed to take on the Murdoch press and other large newspaper groups who would trample over their rights.

“That is where the ‘section 40 costs protections’ enacted by Parliament after Leveson would prove so crucial for access to justice for the public at large. If someone had an arguable case they would know that, by choosing to deny them Leveson-style low-cost arbitration and forcing them into Court, the newspapers would have to pay the costs of the High Court process.”

 

 

 

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network