All Sections

View and post jobs in journalism
  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Comment/Analysis
  • Editor's Pick
  • Interviews
  • News
    • Broadcast Journalism
    • Digital Journalism
    • Magazines
    • Media Law
    • National Newspapers
    • People
      • Appointments
      • Obituaries
    • Regional Newspapers
  • Press Gazette Podcast
  • British Journalism Awards
  • Press Gazette Email Newsletter

In the news

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • Marketing
  • Editorial standards
  • About/Contacts
  • Advertise/Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
Close
[mashshare]
Skip to content
  • Editorial standards
  • About/Contacts
  • Advertise/Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
All sections

Search

Search pressgazette.co.uk

Close

Press Gazette

Subscribe to our email newsletter Journalism email newsletter
  • News
  • Comment
  • Data
  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Marketing
  • Awards
  • Jobs
  • Partners

Menu

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • National Newspapers
  • Regional Newspapers
  • Digital Journalism
  • Broadcast Journalism
  • Media Law
  • Magazines
  • Wires and Agencies
  • Obituaries
  • News
  • Comment/Analysis
  • Jobs
  • British Journalism Awards

In the news

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • Marketing
Close
Staines says scoops have put Guido Fawkes back above The Canary but praises rival's 'extraordinary success'
Telegraph corrects story saying Cambridge University would drop white authors from reading lists
October 26, 2017
  • Digital Journalism
  •    
  • News
  •    
  • Social media
  •    

Russia Today and Sputnik banned from advertising on Twitter over US election 'interference' claims

By Freddy Mayhew Twitter

Share this

  • Tweet
  • Share 0
  • Reddit
Comments
0

Twitter has today announced that it will stop accepting advertising from all accounts owned by Kremlin-backed Russian news outlets Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik, effective immediately.

The online platform said it had based its decision to “off-board advertising” for the two titles on the US intelligence community’s conclusion that they had “attempted to interfere with the [2016 US presidential] election on behalf of the Russian government”.

Said Twitter: “We did not come to this decision lightly, and are taking this step now as part of our ongoing commitment to help protect the integrity of the user experience on Twitter.

“Early this year, the US intelligence community named RT and Sputnik as implementing state-sponsored Russian efforts to interfere with and disrupt the 2016 Presidential election, which is not something we want on Twitter.”

RT and Sputnik have not been banned from the platform entirely and can continue to remain “organic users” in accordance with its rules.

Both titles have UK accounts, which are included in the advertising ban. Russia Today has tweeted that all seven of its accounts are affected. Sputnik is believed to have 16 separate accounts on Twitter.

Twitter has said it will donate the $1.9m it was projected to have earned from RT global advertising since the publication joined in 2011.

It said the funding will go to “support research into the use of Twitter in civic engagement and elections, including use of malicious automation and misinformation, with an initial focus on elections and automation”.

Both RT and Sputnik have tweeted Twitter’s decision as breaking news.

In a statement online, RT has hit back at Twitter, claiming it had been “pushed” to “spend big” on advertising with the platform to promote its coverage of the US election, but eventually declined.

It said it had “never violated any rules while advertising on Twitter”, never used bots or other “compromised tools”, had “never spread any sort of deliberate misinformation and had been a “reliable partner and publisher” on social media.

It added:“RT has never been involved in any illegal activity online and… it never pursued an agenda of influencing the US election through any platforms, including Twitter.”

A spokesperson for Sputnik said: “Sputnik has never used paid for promotion on Twitter.  Sputnik news channels are followed by people who are tired of the mainstream and who are looking for an alternative perspective on the news.”

Picture: Twitter/PA Wire

SIGN UP HERE FOR

MEDIA MONITOR

Press Gazette's weekly email providing strategic insight into the future of the media

Subscribe

Related Stories

  • Academics condemn UK tabloids for sourcing articles from Kremlin-backed RT and Sputnik
  • 'Could that intro get any worse?': Journalists weigh in on first episode of BBC One drama Press
  • More than 5,000 Hacked Off supporters urge Government to enact Section 40 as consultation deadline looms
  • 'Taxpayer-funded propagandists' or 'vital frontline staff'? Press Gazette council PR investigation stirs debate

Explore these topics

  • Russia Today
  • Sputnik
  • Twitter
Browse, search and add journalism jobs
Comments
No comments to display

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More content

Post a job on Press Gazette

Most Popular

  1. ITV News veteran Alastair Stewart joins GB News: In-depth briefing on new channel
  2. Cropped - Prince Philip's 'stag' party Remembering when Fleet Street journalists blagged their way into Prince Philip's stag do
  3. Telegraph newsroom The death of the newsroom means the end of journalism as we know it
  4. Epoch Times homepage Top 50 largest news websites in the world: Surge in traffic to Epoch Times and other right-wing sites
  5. Mark Thompson interview Mark Thompson interview: How New York Times defied 'scepticism' to build digital subscriptions powerhouse

Latest Jobs

  • Media Officer, Deliberate PR
  • CROPPED New Statesman Media Group logo New Statesman podcast producer
  • Senior Data Journalist/Data Journalist, Capital.com
Telegraph corrects story saying Cambridge University would drop white authors from reading lists

© copyright 2021 Press Gazette Ltd. Made in Taiwan.