View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
July 1, 2004updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Ruling bans publication of celebrities’ family pictures

By Press Gazette

Children may have to be edited out of celebrity pictures

British newspapers have been effectively banned from publishing photographs of celebrities with their children by the European Court of Human rights.

The full ruling, which is in French, has been described as “pretty horrific” by a leading international media lawyer.

And it has been interpreted as going much further than both the Editors’ Code of Practice and existing British legal precedent.

The ruling was issued this week in favour of Princess Caroline of Monaco who complained about pictures published in German magazines of her with her family on holiday.

Germany’s top court ruled in 1999 that the magazines were allowed to publish pictures of her in public places, even when on private business, because she was a public figure.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

The princess complained under Article Eight of the Human Rights Convention that the pictures were a breach of her right of respect for her family life.

The court ruled unanimously that “the public does not have a legitimate interest in knowing where [Princess Caroline] is and how she behaves generally in her private life”.

International media law specialist Mark Stephens said: “You’ve got a group of judges from countries that are naturally conservative on privacy issues: Germany, Switzerland and Portugal. They’ve come up with a decision which is very much along the lines of what you would expect in their own countries rather than this one.

“It puts the kibosh on any chance of The Mirror going to the European Court with the Naomi Campbell case and it is going to have an enormous effect on the picture desks of any national newspaper.

“Any time a celebrity is out with its child it can now use the child as a shield. That’s what the decision says.

“Picture editors will now have to crop the child out of celebrity photos or pixelate the child out.

“What the European Court has done has created a law more restrictive than the Code of Practice.”

Stephens, having read the full judgement in French rather than just the translated summary, added: “It’s pretty horrific”.

He added: “All we can hope is that Carter-Ruck can’t read French.”

By Dominic Ponsford

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network