View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Publishers
  2. Digital Journalism
September 16, 2009

Radical online libel shake-up revealed

By PA Mediapoint

Proposals for radical changes to libel laws aimed at updating them for the internet age were published today.

Online publishers currently face the prospect of fresh legal action every time an article is downloaded, even if many years have passed since it first appeared.

Newspapers and civil liberties campaigners complain the effect is to drastically limit freedom of speech.

Changes to the law could involve the abolishing of the 160-year-old “multiple publication rule”, which allows for a new libel claim with every click, providing it is made within a year.

That could be replaced with a “single publication rule”, allowing only one court action against defamatory material, to prevent “open ended liability”.

A consultation paper published by the Ministry of Justice also suggests increasing the limitation period of claims to three years after discovery of the article.

Publishers of online archives and blogs might also be given a defence of qualified privilege against offending article after the year time limit had expired.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

They would face action only if they refused to publish a correction on the offending web page.

The existing rules came out of a 1849 case involving the Duke of Brunswick, who sent his servant to obtain a 17-year-old copy of the Weekly Standard from the newspaper offices.

Despite the limitation period having expired, the court ruled that the article and the libel had effectively been published again.

Media lawyers say the effect of the rule has been to make London the “libel capital of the world” with litigants claiming here against publications based all over the world on the basis of web-based literature.

Mark Stephens, head of media at Finers Stephens Innocent, said “jurisdiction hopping” to take advantage of libel laws here was commonplace.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw said: “Existing defamation law needs to be updated so it is fit for the modern age, and it is important we listen to views on the best way to achieve this.

“Freedom to hold and express opinions is a right that is vital to democracy, as is respect for the rights and freedoms of others. How these principles are balanced in the fast-changing internet age is a fascinating debate.”

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network