MPs say 'shoddy' treatment is deterring whistleblowers and urge Government to take action

The Government has failed to do enough to protect and encourage whistleblowers to come forward, a group of MPs has warned.
The Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said it is "disappointed by the lack of urgency shown in dealing with this important topic" and demanded more be done to drive through changes.
In recent years Press Gazette has repeatedly reported on how public servants who have raised matters of legitimate public interest to the press have found themselves victimised.
These include:
  • Former NHS executive Gary Walker (pictured above) who revealed concerns about patient safety to the BBC in 2013. He told Press Gazette: "I remain blacklisted from the NHS and find getting work very difficult. That is I'm sad to say the plight of most whistleblowers whether they win or lose their cases in court, they are seen as the troublemakers."
  • In January 2016 Press Gazette reported that two police officers who gave evidence in the Sunday Times defence of a libel claim brought by gangster David Hunt have received apologies from the Met Police after themselves being subject to criminal investigations.
  • Three police officers accused of revealing information about former cabinet minister Andrew Mitchell's foul-mouthed Plebgate tirade outside Downing Street in 2012 were sacked by the Met even thought the Crown Prosecution Service said they acted in the public interest.
  • In 2012 Met Police detective April Casburn was jailed for 15 months after she called the News of the World to raise concerns about counter-terrorism resources being used to investigate phone-hacking at the paper. No money changed hands, but the judge was convinced her motive was financial.
  • In 2015 prison union rep Robert Norman was jailed for 15 months after giving stories to the Daily Mirror about mismanagement at Belmarsh prison. Although he was paid £10,000, reporter Stephen Moyes insisted that his primary motive was not financial and that he only contacted the paper after exhausting other routes.
  • In 2014 an NHS executive who told the Daily Mail that she was headhunted by Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust to fix its death rates faced disciplinary action for speaking out.
In a landmark review published last year, Sir Robert Francis QC said a "climate of fear" existed in the NHS in which staff who raised concerns about substandard care were bullied and victimised.
In a previous report in August 2014, the Public Accounts Committee said whistleblowers "have been shockingly treated", and warned that attempts by departments to improve their policies had failed "in modifying a bullying culture".
Meg Hillier MP, who chairs the committee, said: "Whistleblowing policies are too important to get wrong and the Government should be leading by example. The fact that it isn't should concern us all.
"Whistleblowers are on the frontline of defence against wrongdoing and bad practice. They have a vital role to play in the day-to-day accountability of public spending and public service.
"This should be recognised by and enshrined in the culture of every Government department. Where it isn't, senior officials in those departments should be held properly to account."
She added: "There is little doubt that in the past potential whistleblowers will have been deterred by the shoddy treatment experienced by others. It is not beyond the scope of Government to change that, in its own workplaces and beyond."
The report attacks the "slow progress" made in ensuring that those who speak out are protected.
It states: "Nearly a year and a half has elapsed since the previous committee reported on whistleblowing, but we heard little to convince us that any real change has occurred on the ground."
It said the "Task and Finish" group, established to look at whistleblowing across Whitehall, has met only once, and the Cabinet Office does not have the data it needs to identify where improvements are needed.
While new guidance has been drawn up, the focus has been on policy "rather than instilling the positive cultures and behaviours required to support those raising a concern", it added.
Richard Bacon, vice-chairman of the committee, said tangible progress has been "far too slow".
He said: "Whistleblowers may be individuals but if whistleblowing policies are to be fully effective then they must address organisations as a whole.
"That means establishing a positive culture around whistleblowing in the workplace and ensuring all employees in that workplace feel comfortable about raising concerns."
The committee has set a June deadline for the Cabinet Office to report back on progress being made.
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: "The Government takes this issue very seriously. We have worked hard to create a culture where employees are confident to blow the whistle.
"In January, we collected data for the first time from across departments on whistleblowing cases and will continue do this on a regular basis. This information will be important as we take action to address this issue.
"As agreed with the Committee, we will respond to them by the end of the month to show the progress that we have made."
Rachael Tiffen, head of the counter-fraud centre of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (Cipfa) said: "These findings are worrying. Whistleblowing policy is essential for tackling fraud and corruption.
"Since fraudsters are helping themselves to a staggering £21 billion from the public purse each year, with barely a fraction of a per cent being caught, the Government must take these recommendations seriously.
"These issues are already being challenged in local government. Cipfa is working with councils, government and the Local Government Association to develop a comprehensive approach including robust and fair whistleblowing policies."
No comments to display

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *