View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
February 26, 2013

Proposed Police and Criminal Evidence Act changes: ‘It’s going to end up with more journalists going to jail’

By Dominic Ponsford

Journalists will end up going to prison if Home Office proposals to loosen up legal protection for sources go through, a reporter involved in a landmark press freedom fight has warned.

The Government is set to put changes to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) out to consultation later this year.

These include the recommendation from Leveson that journalistic material would only be protected under PACE if it did not breach confidentiality agreements or other laws.

And they suggest that police would no longer have to prove they tried to get the information from other sources before targeting journalists.

The Home Office has also accepted a recommendation that all ACPO rank police officers must keep notes of conversations with the media.

And it has adopted guidelines which state that police officers should not communicate with the media unless “there is a policing purpose for doing so”.

In 2008 journalist Shiv Malik, who now works for The Guardian, lost a legal fight with Manchester police at the High Court and was forced to hand over his notes of conversations with a suspected terrorist after a production order under PACE.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Malik described the proposed Home Office changes as “outrageous”.

He said: “It’s going to end up with more journalists going to jail because so much information comes from people who are breaching confidentiality agreements. Anyone covered by the Official Secrets Act or with confidentiality clauses in the contracts of employment could be covered by this.

“This is going to make it almost impossible for journalists to keep their sources secret. That means journalists will go to prison rather than give up their sources.

“This is a terrible move.”

City University’s head of journalism George Brock also sounded alarm bells about the proposals at a speech on the impact of Leveson delivered at Gresham College, London, this week.

He said: “The Home Office has put out to consultation regulations which are so strict about contacts between newspapers reporters and police sources that they would almost certainly have prevented the reporting of the phone-hacking scandal itself. Police sources were extremely important for that story.”

 

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network