View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
October 24, 2002updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

‘Outing’ of Ulrika rape man a gaffe, insists Wright

By Press Gazette

Wright: "mortified" by mistake

Channel Five presenter Matthew Wright was "mortified" at his slip which led to the man at the centre of the Ulrika Jonsson rape story being splashed across the nation’s tabloids.

The channel and a number of newspapers are now waiting to hear if the ‘outed’ star will sue for libel after Wright inadvertently named him on his chat show on Wednesday.

The Evening Standard and its This is London website swiftly reported on Wright’s gaffe, having legalled the story first. The Edinburgh Evening News followed suit and the next day several national newspapers also named the man. The star has so far not made a comment.

Wright, who has the same agent as the star, named him during a review of the papers. He apologised on air shortly afterwards.

Max Clifford, who appeared on the show, said a producer had asked him beforehand if he would say if the TV presenter was his client if Wright named him.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

"I said ‘no’," said Clifford. "I went on air to talk about the people who approached me and the advice I would give to those involved." Channel 5 said it was "absolutely, categorically" not the case that Wright had deliberately named him.

"It was never the intention of The Wright Stuff to name anyone in connection with the story," a spokeswoman said. "Journalists have been sitting on this man’s doorstep for days  and his name is well known in media circles – it’s a mistake that any one of them could have made."

Richard Shillito, partner at solicitors Farrer & Co, said that if the presenter decided to take legal action, he couldn’t see what defence media companies could have "except to try to prove that it’s true, for which purpose they would need Ulrika’s assistance".

 

By Julie Tomlin

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network