New BBC chair says Brexit coverage 'incredibly balanced' - Press Gazette

New BBC chairman says Brexit coverage was 'incredibly balanced' and calls licence fee 'least worst' option

BBC Brexit coverage praised by new chairman Richard Sharp

The BBC’s next chairman, ex-banker Richard Sharp, has said its coverage of Brexit was “incredibly balanced” but that the broadcaster needs to get better at investigating complaints against it.

Richard Sharp blamed confirmation bias on both sides of the argument for many of the accusations of partiality around the BBC’s Brexit news and information output.

The Government named Sharp as its preferred candidate to be the next BBC chairman last week and he appeared for a pre-appointment grilling in front of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee on Thursday.

Asked if he thought the BBC’s Brexit coverage had been unbalanced, Richard Sharp said: “No, actually I don’t.

“I believe there were some occasions when the Brexit representation was unbalanced.

“So if you ask me if I think Question Time seemed to have more Remainers than Brexiteers, the answer is yes, but the breadth of the coverage I thought was incredibly balanced, in a highly toxic environment that was extremely polarised.”

He dodged defining his own position on Brexit, saying: “I’m considered to be a Brexiteer.”

[Sign up for Press Gazette’s must-read newsletters: Media Monitor (strategic insight every Thursday), PG Daily and Marketing Matters]

Sharp later said the BBC needs to be its “own toughest critic on impartiality” but that it sometimes adopts an “ad hominem defence which is we are the BBC therefore it’s impartial”.

He added: “It shouldn’t be instinctively defensive, it should say ‘somebody intelligent has accused us of being impartial, we’re going to look at it objectively and form a view…

“The BBC has to be open that from time to time it may get it wrong… the question is, is it systematically impartial, does it have a groupthink, are the editors all one way or the other and it needs to be balanced and everybody working in the BBC needs to understand they hold the reputation of the BBC in their hands.

“And to make mistakes – they happen from time to time but they certainly shouldn’t happen systemically and if they do that’s a failure of the executive and it’s a failure of the governors.”

Sharp said he is not in favour of decriminalisation of the licence fee, which he described as the “least worst” option for funding the BBC.

“I happen to be satisfied looking at it in a superficial way that the current process is fit for purpose,” he said although he acknowledged it “may be worth reassessing”.

Sharp revealed he has previously applied for the chairman job and not got it, and that he plans to give his entire £160,000 salary for the part-time role to charity.

Sharp appeared on the Sunday Times Rich List in 2008 with an estimated worth of £150m.

He has donated about £400,000 to the Conservative party in the past 20 years but said he has in the past ten years met the standards of the Civil Service Code and that he will not make any political donations while in the chairman position.

He also insisted that although he applied for the job because of encouragement from friends, there were no politicians among them.

Sharp, 64, was once Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s boss and he acted as an adviser to help him with his response to the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. He will now leave this role.

He is a former chairman of principal investment in Europe at financial services giant Goldman Sachs and has more than 30 years of experience in the financial sector, also spending time in both commercial and investment banking for JP Morgan.

He was also a member of the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee from 2013 until 2019 and sits on the board of the Centre for Policy Studies, the think tank founded by Margaret Thatcher in the 1970s.

Sharp was asked about the cancellation of the regional investigative journalism programme Inside Out last year and he said this type of content was a “fantastic opportunity for the BBC to differentiate itself” from the tech giants.

[Read more: BBC says Inside Out cancellation part of ‘long overdue’ changes to regional current affairs output]

“I’m certainly a great believer in community and localism and in the BBC’s desire to compete with offerings that have global resonance and compete with the Netflixes, the Amazons, the Apples of the world etc it’s easy to lose sight of the important community which is very local and I think one of the things this pandemic has brought to us is an understanding of the importance of real localism in terms of much smaller communities even than regions,” he said.

He also raised the culture inside the BBC as a key issue, pointing to the equal pay row, trust in leadership and the “chaotic processes” identified in a 2012 report, saying it would “produce a better output inevitably” if some rebuilding takes place to ensure staff are happy to work there.

Picture: DCMS/PA Wire

SIGN UP HERE FOR

FUTURE OF MEDIA

Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.

Comments

1 thought on “New BBC chairman says Brexit coverage was 'incredibly balanced' and calls licence fee 'least worst' option”

  1. It was ‘incredibly balanced’ during the campaign – and that was exactly the problem. When politicians are peddling lies and disinformation, the job of impartial journalists is to tell the public that they are peddling lies and disinformation.

    Unfortunately, the BBC has for many years conflated impartiality with balance, so instead of just telling the public that something is a lie, it tends to legitimise the lie by ‘balancing’ it against the truth. The lie ends up being treated with credulity – framed as being of equal importance and validity as the truth, in a ‘he says, she says’ type argument. During the Brexit referendum, this approach by the BBC gave credence to lie after lie by the leave campaigners.

    The BBC is also responsible for the groundswell of support for Brexit which led to the referendum, by dint of the prominence it gave Nigel Farage. Farage has been booked as a Question Time contributor more than anybody else this century and is constantly platformed on other BBC shows as well, despite his record of failure as a politician.

    His politics are really not very dissimilar to Nick Griffin’s but because the BBC saw him as a bit kooky – always pulling funny faces and getting into scrapes – it considered him entertaining rather than dangerous. But he was dangerous. His ideology provoked a national surge in hate crimes which began during the referendum campaign and has never abated. It directly led to the assassination of an MP by a white supremacist terrorist. He speaks at far right rallies in other nations. He gave a speech saying that if Brexit was not delivered, his supporters should take up arms and hunt down politicians. The BBC still platforms him to this day. That is unforgivable.

    And after the referendum, the BBC freely admitted that it was no longer platforming people who were opposed to Brexit and was instead focusing its resources on covering the Brexit process. So from that point on its coverage did become very one-sided. This was highlighted by ludicrous editorial decisions, such as refusing to cover enormous anti-Brexit marches attended by tens or hundreds of thousands of people, but obediently showing up for pathetic publicity stunts, like Jacob Rees Mogg waving a fish about, and regularly covering far smaller demonstrations about other issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *