The chairman of the public inquiry into press standards today warned editors against targeting people who speak out against intrusion by journalists.
Lord Justice Leveson said his team would monitor newspaper coverage over the coming months for any evidence that witnesses to his hearings were being singled out for negative stories.
- May 22, 2018
- May 21, 2018
- May 18, 2018
Speaking at the opening of his inquiry, the chairman stressed that the freedom of the press was “fundamental” to the UK’s democracy and way of life.
He also recognised that there was a “great deal to applaud” in Britain’s present press, adding: “I certainly do not intend to limit my consideration to activities which could be the subject of criticism.”
But he stressed that he would be alert to any evidence of newspapers victimising witnesses who complained about press intrusion.
Lord Justice Leveson said: “Concern has specifically been expressed that those who speak out might be targeted adversely by the press as a result.
“I have absolutely no wish to stifle freedom of speech and expression, but I anticipate that monitoring will take place of press coverage over the months to come.
“And if it appears that those concerns are made out, without objective justification, it might be appropriate to draw the conclusion that these vital rights are being abused, which itself would provide evidence of culture, practice and ethics which could be relevant to my ultimate recommendations.”
Prime Minister David Cameron set up the Leveson Inquiry in July after revelations that a private detective working for the News of the World hacked the phone of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler.
Lord Justice Leveson, a Court of Appeal judge, said the task of his investigation could be summed up in one simple question: “Who guards the guardians?”
He said freedom of expression and freedom of the press must be exercised “with the rights of others in mind”.
He said he had encouraged newspaper editors to meet and discuss these issues outside his hearings and put forward proposals for how the press could be better regulated.
“Those ideas must reflect the fundamental freedoms to which I have referred,” he said.
“But it must also recognise that ‘guard the guardians’ is not an optional add-on.
“Neither is it good enough if it does not take account of the legitimate public concern, not only about phone hacking, but also other unethical behaviour not justified by what is truly in the public interest.”
The first part of the inquiry is looking at the culture, practices and ethics of the press in general.
The second part, examining the extent of unlawful activities by journalists, will not begin until detectives have completed their work and any prosecutions have concluded.
Milly’s father Bob was among those who attended the start of the inquiry in Court 73 of the Royal Courts of Justice.