View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
July 6, 2006updated 22 Nov 2022 8:05pm

Lance Armstrong and Sunday Times settle over drug claims

By Press Gazette

Cyclist Lance Armstrong, seven times winner of the Tour de France, and The Sunday Times have settled their legal dispute over doping allegations.

The dispute stems from an article that appeared in June 2004, which Armstrong's lawyers argued could be interpreted as meaning that he had taken performance-enhancing drugs and that he was a "fraud, a cheat and a liar". The paper denied that this was the meaning of the piece.

Mr Justice Gray in a High Court ruling on Friday said: "In my judgment, the hypothetical ordinary, reasonable reader would have understood The Sunday Times's article as a whole — read once in conjunction with its headline, photographs and their captions — to mean that Mr Armstrong had taken drugs to enhance his performance in cycling competitions."

"If that is the meaning, then it appears to me inevitably to follow that Mr Armstrong's conduct in so doing was fraudulent and amounted to cheating and that his denials were lies.

Accordingly, I would uphold the meaning contended for on behalf of Mr Armstrong and reject the meaning advanced on behalf of the defendants."

In the wake of last Friday's High Court ruling, law firm Schillings, who acted for Armstrong, said in a statement: "The Sunday Times and Mr Armstrong are pleased to announce that they have settled their legal disputes.

The Sunday Times has confirmed to Mr Armstrong that it never intended to accuse him of being guilty of taking any performance-enhancing drugs and sincerely apologised for any such impression."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

In a statement, Armstrong said: "I am extremely happy with today's judgment, which is the latest in a series of consistent rulings in our favour. I always said that the article falsely alleged that I was guilty of doping. The article was based on untrue allegations, which are without substance."

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network