View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
July 5, 2006updated 22 Nov 2022 8:04pm

Judge wins libel case against The Independent

By Press Gazette

A senior military judge today accepted a public apology and substantial but undisclosed libel damages at London’s High Court over an article in the Independent in April this year headlined “Justice never had a hearing in this case.”

Mr Justice Eady was told that the article appeared the day after Judge Advocate Bayliss’s verdict in a widely-publicised Court Martial decision in the case of Flight Lieutenant Malcolm Kendall-Smith who was convicted of five charges of failing to comply with lawful orders for refusing to serve in Iraq.

Solicitor Isabel Hudson for Judge Bayliss, said that before being appointed to the post of an Assistant Judge Advocate General in 1996, he had been a Chief Naval Judge Advocate and is also today a Crown Court recorder.

She said the article complained of made a “scathing attack” on the manner in which the Court Martial had been handled by Judge Bayliss and suggested he had “presided over a kangaroo court, had unfairly refused to allow Flight Lieutenant Kendall-Smith to put forward a defence and had not acted with the professionalism, integrity and independence expected of the judiciary.”

However, she said : “These suggestions were false.”

She said that there was no reason to question Judge Bayliss’s professionalism, integrity or independence and the paper now acknowledged this.

She continued : “The article caused Judge Advocate Bayliss great distress and embarrassment particularly given that he continues to carry out his judicial functions to preside over Courts Martial and to sit as a Recorder in the Crown Court.”

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

However, she said the paper had now published a full apology and had agreed to pay the judge substantial damages along with his legal costs.

For the paper solicitor Julian Darrell said the apologised unreservedly for the distress and embarrassment that had been caused by publication of the “false allegations contained in the article.”

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network