View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
January 16, 2003updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Heads back down after paper excludes pupils

By Press Gazette

By Jon Slattery

David Penman

An evening paper has won a battle against a town’s head teachers who were refusing to allow it to use any pictures of schoolchildren.

Last autumn, the Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph in Kettering was told that the primary head teachers’ association in Wellingborough had decided that it would only release pictures if the paper agreed to only use pupils’ first names.

It was another example of the fear of paedophiles being used to deny pictures of schoolchildren which have traditionally been part of the way local papers cover their community.

When the paper refused, the heads told editor David Penman they would not allow the Evening Telegraph to use any pictures of the children in any circumstances.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Penman was told the ban had been imposed after the primary heads met and voted on the issue. It meant pictures of Wellingborough school pupils were excluded from the Telegraph’s First Class supplement featuring first-year pupils in its circulation area.

“There was a standoff,” he said. “We published pictures of all the first-year classes apart from those in Wellingborough. The heads in Wellingborough came under pressure from parents, met again and voted to rescind their decision.”

The head teachers have now told parents that if they don’t want their children to appear in the Evening Telegraph, they can opt out and the school will exclude them from photographs.

Penman said: “I was concerned that we were going to have reports of football teams which read ‘John scored after a cross from Peter’ and that we couldn’t give full names of children who had won art or poetry prizes. It would have been ludicrous. I think it was an important stand to take.”

Penman told Press Gazette he had never had a complaint from a parent about using pictures of their children.

“I think it is an overreaction to Soham. The idea that paedophiles are out there queueing up to buy our newspaper so they can abduct small children is frankly ludicrous.

“We have never had a problem with a parent saying they did not want

pictures of their children in the paper. It is only institutions that have made it an issue.”

Feature, page 20

Jon Slattery

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network