View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
July 23, 2012updated 14 Sep 2012 3:40pm

Harwood ruling raises question over online archives

By Press Gazette

A ruling made during last week's manslaughter trial of PC Simon Harwood could have major implications for the way online archives of news stories are managed.

The issue of when something is "published" on the internet was at the centre of Mr Justice Fulford's decision that two articles giving details of previous allegations against Pc Simon Harwood were a breach of the strict liability rule of the Contempt of Court Act.

Both articles were published in 2010, and had been available on the Mail Online archive since then, but only if a would-be reader actually searched for them, either on the website itself, or via a search enginee.

Section 2 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 states: "The strict liability rule applies to a publication only if the proceedings in question are active within the meaning of this section at the time of the publication."

Mr Justice Fulford held that the phrase "at the time of the publication" actually "encompasses the entire period during which the material is available on the website from the moment of its first appearance through to when it was withdrawn".

These remarks prompted Des Hudson, managing director of the Herald, Sunday Herald and Evening Times in Glasgow, to say: "In the light of the ruling we have been looking at what we should be doing to comply. And we came to the view that we would have to be aware of every case and decide whether we had any material on our archive.

"The only way we could do that cost-effectively would be to take down the archives completely."

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Jonathan Caplan QC, for Associated Newspapers, argued at a hearing before Mr Justice Fulford that the Contempt of Court Act, was concerned with material which was published and offered to the public on a contemporary basis – which did not cover material stored in an online archive.

During the Harwood case the Telegraph and Mail voluntarily took down archive articles which the trial judge said could create a risk of contempt.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network