View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. News
January 8, 2021updated 30 Sep 2022 9:55am

Halifax Courier’s failure to protect source led to her being sacked from shop job, IPSO finds

By Charlotte Tobitt

A source who raised concerns to her local newspaper about conditions in the shop where she worked during the first Covid-19 lockdown was fired in part because a journalist revealed her identity in an email to her employer, press regulator IPSO has found.

IPSO said the Halifax Courier’s failure to protect the woman’s confidentiality was a “breach of a moral obligation” that had “serious consequences” for her as it ordered the newspaper to signpost an adjudication on its front page.

The woman, who worked as a floor manager for a retail chain, posted online on 28 March about her experiences at work with the name of her employer evident on her page at that time.

A journalist commented on the post, which has since been deleted, asking her to get in touch and the woman subsequently sent two emails outlining concerns about a lack of measures to protect staff from Covid-19 and non-essential purchases being made, alleging that the shop had put profit above the health of its employees.

The woman made clear that she needed to stay anonymous for fear of losing her job but was later suspended partly because of an allegation she had “made derogatory comments regarding the company and its customers to the media”.

She was dismissed on the grounds of gross misconduct on 4 May after the employer substantiated the allegation.

[Sign up for Press Gazette’s must-read newsletters: Media Monitor (strategic insight every Thursday), PG Daily and Marketing Matters]

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The Courier denied its journalist had revealed the woman’s identity in his email, claiming he had said only that she worked at one of its two Halifax stores.

However, it could not produce any proof as the email had been deleted “through error” after just a few months despite the paper having a policy to retain emails for two years.

The paper pointed out that the employer’s hearing notes and a letter to the woman did not refer to her by name, referring only to her “comments… to the media”.

But the employer provided an extract from an email described as being from “the media” that named the woman and contained the same complaints in the same language she had made to the journalist. In addition the woman said she had only spoken to the Courier.

IPSO said the paper had failed to prove it protected the woman as a confidential source and described the incident as a “very serious” breach of Clause 14 (confidential sources) of the Editors’ Code of Practice.

“The Committee took the opportunity to express its serious concern over the breach of Clause 14 in this instance,” it said. “It represented a breach of a moral obligation and had had serious consequences for the complainant.”

IPSO decided that because the course of events had partly led to the woman’s dismissal, with the incident worsened by the publication’s “gross failure of record-keeping”, the paper should publish an adjudication on page three or further forward signposted with a front page headline.

The adjudication was also published online and stayed in the top half of the Courier’s homepage for 24 hours.

Read the full IPSO ruling here.

The rare breach of Clause 14 was revealed just two weeks after IPSO ruled the Central Fife Times & Advertiser had breached the same section of the code by publishing a source’s name despite a written agreement not to do so.

IPSO said it happened because the reporter who first dealt with the story went on leave and did not mention the agreement to the colleague who took it over, with Covid-19 remote working worsening internal communications.

[Read more: Law Commission review of police powers to seize journalistic material ‘extremely worrying’]

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network