View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Gordon Brown says ‘destroy’ Murdoch claim untrue

By Dominic Ponsford

Lawyers representing former prime minister Gordon Brown have written to the Leveson Inquiry denying that he had threatened to ‘destroy’Rupert Murdoch.

The letter was sent in response to evidence given to the inquiry by former Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie on 9 January.

He alleged that around the time of the Labour Party conference in September 2009 Brown called Murdoch on the phone. The alleged call happened after the Sun withdrew its backing from Labour with a front page story published the day after Brown’s keynote conference speech.

MacKenzie said: ‘That night a furious Brown called Murdoch and, in Rupert’s words, ‘roared at me for 20 minutes’.”

MacKenzie said that Murdoch himself was the source for this story.

MacKenzie said: ‘At the end, Brown said, ‘You’re trying to destroy me and my party, I will destroy you and your company.'”

Brown’s lawyers said: ‘The story is completely untrue. It is important that it does not become accepted as a fact. A respected national newspaper has already raised it as if it were a fact in the course of a PCC investigation of a complaint made by Mr Brown (which was upheld).”

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Brown’s lawyers said: ‘Mr Brown has a clear recollection of the calls he had with Mr Murdoch when he was Prime Minister. He had no such conversation with Mr Murdoch at any time during the conference. Thus, the words attributed to him by Mr MacKenzie were not said by him to Mr Murdoch, and the statement attributed to Mr Murdoch by Mr MacKenzie is factually wrong.”

They noted that the statement was not tested ‘as to its reliability or credibility in the inquiry. Yet the press reported it, and that evidence, substantially – as fact.”

The PCC ruled in November that the Sunday Telegraph breached clause one of the Editors’ Code (accuracy) because it presented a contentious anecdote as fact and the paper should have gone to Brown for comment in advance of publication. But it did not censure the paper because it said an offer to publish a clarification provided sufficient remedial action, even though Brown said it did not go far enough.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network