View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
November 6, 2003updated 22 Nov 2022 1:24pm

Free speech must overrule royals’ desire to gag press

By Press Gazette

Whatever happened to the old editors’ adage that the royals never resort to the law? These days, the paths between various royal palaces and the High Court seem to be busier than Oxford Street on the Saturday before Christmas.

In recent years, the Prince of Wales, the Duchess of York, the Countess of Wessex and even the Queen have all sought refuge behind various of m’learned friends’ devices to prevent publication of embarrassing stories or to seek redress afterwards.

Prince Charles, famously, wanted Daily Mirror editor Richard Stott jailed after he printed extracts from a banned book by housekeeper Wendy Berry.

This week, the stately procession turned to a stampede with two injunctions – obtained by a former royal aide, but apparently with a clear royal seal of approval – granted within three days.

First up, before Mr Justice McKinnon on Saturday, was The Mail on Sunday. It had conducted a lengthy interview with another former royal servant, who had sworn an affidavit to support the claims he was making to the paper.

But the servant’s former colleague acted to prevent the story and an injunction was granted, apparently on the grounds that the account may be libellous.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Then, on Monday, The Guardian was preparing to publish the name of the man who had obtained the injunction – having ascertained that his action against the MoS did not prevent it from doing so.

But no – it was back to court again, this time to prevent the identity of the gagger from emerging.

Once again, the injunction was granted.

And behind all of the legal toings and froings lurks the spectre of the “senior member of the Royal Family” who wrote to the MoS on Saturday demanding that the story be withheld.

The flurry of activity is worrying on a number of counts. Does not an injunction on the grounds that a piece may be libellous – when the newspaper is clearly prepared to defend its truth – amount to censorship? Surely the libel courts should decide. Are the facts of a story concerning the details of our own monarchy’s households not in the public interest? As Sunday Mail editor Allan Rennie, when his paper was subject to a Prince Charles injunction, put it last year: Do we want a democracy with free speech where the public interest comes first? Or an outdated monarchy where privilege and self-interest rule? Incorporating Magazine

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network