View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
May 14, 2014updated 10 Jul 2014 1:09pm

EU court ruling means accurate stories already in public domain could be placed beyond the reach of search engines

By Cleland Thom

Journalists will find it harder to research stories following yesterday’s European Court ruling in Google’s ‘right to be forgotten’ case.

And the court’s decision could mean media websites with search tools being forced to remove copy and photos from their archive.

The ruling allows EU citizens to ask search engines to remove links to sites that contain their historic personal information.

This will include stories and photos in newspaper and magazine archives, even if they are accurate and already in the public domain.

Other online search tools – including those on YouTube and Facebook will be affected. 

So in future, a journalist may find there is far less information available online when they research someone.

There will be a public interest defence, and people in public life will have fewer rights.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

But any decision on public interest will have already been taken in appeals process, without input from the media, or possibility of appeal.

To get personal information removed, people will have to establish that the information is:

  • inadequate
  • irrelevant
  • no longer relevant, or
  • excessive when weighed against context of the original publication, and the amount of time since it was published.

The court’s decision was not as surprising as many commentators suggest.

Media archives were mentioned in an EU Working Party report on data protection legislation, published last month.

The report cited a fictitious example of a local celebrity who challenged his local paper over an archived story about a historic drunk and disorderly offence.

The report said: "What is most disturbing for the individual is that by searching his name with common search engines online, the link to this old piece of news is among the first results concerning him."

The report said that if the paper refused to restrict the story, the man could complain under data protection legislation, if he could prove damage and distress.

An Information Commissioner spokesman told me: "People do have a right to object and the newspaper, as data controller, would have to consider it."

The Google ruling may also affect new media guidelines on the Data Protection Act, due to be published by the Information Commission this summer.

The act contains exemption for ‘journalistic purposes’.

But the draft guidelines question whether a story in a media archive is a ‘journalistic resource’ or a ‘historical record’.

Put this with the Google decision, and you don't need to be an expert to see legislation affecting media archives is heading.

Cleland Thom is the author of the new eBook, Internet law for journalists.

 

Advertisement

A dozen of the UK's leading legal minds will explain what the Defamation Act 2013 means for journalists and the media at a unique conference being organised by Press Gazette in London on 19 June. The cost of defending a libel action at trial can be more than £1m, tickets for Defamation 2014 start from £89+VAT. Follow the links to book direct at the event page, or emailthomas.collinge@progressivemediagroup.com to secure your place and arrange payment within 28 days by invoice.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network