View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
March 13, 2003updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Code helping to end outdated, offensive language

By Press Gazette

The director of the old Press Council once told Press Gazette that the biggest reaction to an adjudication by the watchdog concerned the use of the word “Jap” in a headline.

The council had rejected the complaint and a deluge of adverse publicity followed.

The press does not appear to have taken on board how sensitive a subject this is. Acting Press Complaints Commission chairman Professor Robert Pinker raised just such a cause in a speech to the Reuters Foundation Programme last week.

Recalling a time in the Eighties when some sections of the press deployed “outrageous sexist, racist and homophobic language”, he argued that the Editors’ Code has been responsible for a transformation over the past decade.

Not since 1997 had the commission had to uphold a complaint about pejorative language used about an individual, he said.

But, in particular, he deprecated the use of the word “Jap” to describe the Japanese.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Explaining that many people did not appreciate the strong connotations associated with the word – and that it was “unacceptably painful and pejorative to modern Japanese people” – he said: “I do hope that over time we can move finally to consign it to the bin.”

Pinker also set out to correct a few misconceptions about the PCC:

The commission is powerless to deal with reports – no matter how critical – of groups of people. In fact, a number of objections to such articles – in particular, coverage of asylum and immigration issues – had been resolved under clauses of the code, notably accuracy.
A rise in discrimination complaints means that the press is getting worse. Pinker claimed: “The truth is that while the number of complaints has been increasing, the number of articles complained about has not. If anything, that has declined.”

By Jean Morgan

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network