View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
March 6, 2003updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Campbell’s appeal challenge

By Press Gazette

The legal battle between Naomi Campbell and the Daily Mirror is to go the whole way.

Three law lords, headed by Lord Bingham, the country’s senior law lord, have given the green light for the supermodel to challenge an Appeal Court decision to strip her of High Court damages she was awarded over a story about her attending Narcotics Anonymous (NA).

The appeal is now expected to be heard later this year.

In a brief notice the lords published their decision to allow the appeal to go ahead. The key issues are whether, when it had been decided that the paper was entitled to publish the fact Campbell had been addicted to drugs, the publication of details relating to non-medical treatment she had received and a photograph of her leaving a treatment session constituted a breach of confidence or invasion of her privacy.

The other question to be decided is whether the exemption in the Data Protection Act in respect of data processing with a view to journalistic publication applied to publication of the article in the Mirror.

In the Appeal Court decision last year, Campbell was stripped of the damages she had won after suing the Mirror over the revelations that she had been attending NA.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

In awarding £3,500 damages in the Mirror action, Mr Justice Morland had backed the claims of the 31-year-old model, who had accused the Mirror of breaches of confidence, privacy and the Data Protection Act.

However, over turning the ruling in the decision Campbell now wants to appeal against, Master of the Rolls Lord Phillips said he and Lords Justices Chadwick and Keene considered that the Mirror had been entitled to publish what they did in the public interest.

By Roger Pearson

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network