All Sections

View and post jobs in journalism
  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Comment/Analysis
  • Editor's Pick
  • Interviews
  • News
    • Broadcast Journalism
    • Digital Journalism
    • Magazines
    • Media Law
    • National Newspapers
    • People
      • Appointments
      • Obituaries
    • Regional Newspapers
  • Press Gazette Podcast
  • British Journalism Awards
  • Press Gazette Email Newsletter

In the news

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • Marketing
  • Editorial standards
  • About/Contacts
  • Advertise/Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
Close
[mashshare]
Skip to content
  • Editorial standards
  • About/Contacts
  • Advertise/Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
All sections

Search

Search pressgazette.co.uk

Close

Press Gazette

Subscribe to our email newsletter Journalism email newsletter
  • News
  • Comment
  • Data
  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Marketing
  • Awards
  • Jobs
  • Partners

Menu

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • National Newspapers
  • Regional Newspapers
  • Digital Journalism
  • Broadcast Journalism
  • Media Law
  • Magazines
  • Wires and Agencies
  • Obituaries
  • News
  • Comment/Analysis
  • Jobs
  • British Journalism Awards

In the news

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • Marketing
Close
Owner of Irish website The Liberal pays damages and issues apology for using court agency copy without paying
Max Mosley-funded press regulator Impress arbitrates £2.5k libel payout by website Byline which he has shares in
July 13, 2017
  • Media Law
  •    
  • News
  •    

Byline Media ordered to pay journalist Dennis Rice £2,500 under first libel arbitration from regulator Impress

By Dominic Ponsford Twitter

Share this

  • Tweet
  • Share 0
  • Reddit
Comments
13

The arbitration arm of press regulator Impress has concluded its first complaint and ordered website Byline to pay £2,500 in libel damages to freelance journalist Dennis Rice.

Rice complained over two twitter messages posted by Byline, the journalism crowdfunding site which has signed up to Royal Charter-backed regulator Impress.

Timeline

  • March 22, 2019

    Byline team to rebrand and launch print title for subscribers in telling stories others 'have ignored'

  • September 13, 2018

    Impress dismisses complaint by child sex abuse victim named without consent in Byline article

  • June 12, 2018

    Byline Media and journalist Peter Jukes pursue damages and apology after hacking allegations by Brexit campaigners

Under the Royal Charter, Impress must offer claimants a free libel complaints arbitration scheme.

Rice opted to go to arbitration rather than have his case decided by the Impress complaints committee.

Rice complained over two Twitter messages posted from the Byline Media account on 6 March 2017.

He is a former investigations editor of the Mail on Sunday who today works as a freelance TV producer and PR consultant.

Byline sent the tweets in question as part of its investigation into the use of private detective Steve Whittamore by the Daily Mail and other titles and into the illegal “blagging” of private information in the mid 2000s.

Rice says that collectively the tweets in question were viewed by potentially over 54,000 people.

The first from the @Byline account said: “High on #blaggingscandal PI Steve Whittamore’s top contact list – AFTER charging – is @Dennisricemedia’s phone number and email”.

The second @Byline Twitter message said: “If anyone else remembers @Dennisricemedia tabloid trolling #Leveson witnesses and @Byline Media journos we have new evidence might explain”.

Rice told the arbitrator: “When the tweets – posted three minutes apart – are paired against me anyone reading them is left with the clear and false impression that I trolled witnesses to the Leveson inquiry in order to cover up the fact that I was a ‘top contact of Whittamore’.”

The panel found that tweet number one “lacked defamatory tendency”.

It said the panel’s view was that the meaning of the first tweet was that Rice was a “top contact” of Whittamore rather than that he had been engaged in blagging himself.

On tweet two the panel found that “tabloid trolling” means it was alleged Rice was involved in “disruptive and upsetting” activity.

Rice said the tweets caused him “serious harm” as required under the Defamation Act, because they come up in Google searches and could deter prospective clients for his business. The panel agreed that tweet number two was not true and did cause serious harm to Rice’s reputation.

It found that £2,500 was reasonable compensation for Rice and directed that Byline Media shall not republish the information.

Rice told Press Gazette: “I would like to thank the arbitrator and Impress for the professional way in which they dealt with my complaint.

“I now hope this brings to an end what has been a long and sorry conflict between myself and by Byline chief executive Peter Jukes.”

Byline said in a statement: “We are happy that this first arbitration process has defended us against Mr Rice’s claims for harassment and malicious falsehood and vindicated Byline Investigations by finding its first tweet accurate.”

On the tweet which was found to be defamatory, Byline said: “We are currently seeking legal advice on appealing this part of the decision to further establish the benchmarks for publishers. We will be launching our crowdfund for this very soon.””

SIGN UP HERE FOR

MEDIA MONITOR

Press Gazette's weekly email providing strategic insight into the future of the media

Subscribe

Related Stories

  • £65k legal bill for reporter after failed bid to challenge lawyer's 'unlawful newsgathering' slur
  • Byline Media facing legal action from journalist for recovery of £2,500 libel damages awarded by Impress arbitrator
  • Johnston Press closures mean more than 300 UK local newspapers have gone in last ten years
  • The 61 arrested UK journalists: Table with details of those charged, cleared and still on bail

Explore these topics

  • Byline
  • Impress
Browse, search and add journalism jobs
Comments

13 thoughts on “Byline Media ordered to pay journalist Dennis Rice £2,500 under first libel arbitration from regulator Impress”

  1. Simon H says:
    September 10, 2017 at 3:55 pm

    And that’s the last we will here from Dennis Tabloid Troll Rice. When you can prove your innocence by posting a single non-confidential document, which you tell everyone you have but never produce, that is all the proof everyone else requires.

    Reply
  2. Simon H says:
    September 5, 2017 at 2:43 am

    You can not get your IP history from Twitter’s security team, you download it from a link on the website. With that history you can prove you were not Tabloid Troll. You must have dynamic IP which constantly changes, as you refer to plural addresses, so there is no security or privacy reason to not post the data and prove your innocence. Over to you.

    Reply
1 2 3 4 5 … 7

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More content

Post a job on Press Gazette

Most Popular

  1. GB News briefing: Channel will be 'free, fair and impartial' says news chief John McAndrew as political editor named
  2. Regional ABCs 2020 ABCs: UK local newspaper sales hard-hit by pandemic with dailies down by average of 18%
  3. Cardiff Bay in Wales (Shutterstock) Happy St David's day for Welsh media with launch of two new national titles
  4. most popular newspapers UK National press ABCs: Impact of latest UK lockdown on circulation
  5. How UK press moved from denial to acceptance and now action on climate change

Latest Jobs

  • Editor (Maternity Cover), Place North West
  • Environment Impact Producer, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
  • Global Health Impact Producer, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
Max Mosley-funded press regulator Impress arbitrates £2.5k libel payout by website Byline which he has shares in

© copyright 2021 Press Gazette Ltd. Made in Taiwan.