All Sections

View and post jobs in journalism
  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Comment/Analysis
  • Editor's Pick
  • Interviews
  • News
    • Broadcast Journalism
    • Digital Journalism
    • Magazines
    • Media Law
    • National Newspapers
    • People
      • Appointments
      • Obituaries
    • Regional Newspapers
  • Press Gazette Podcast
  • British Journalism Awards
  • Press Gazette Email Newsletter

In the news

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • Marketing
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • RSS
Close
[mashshare]
Skip to content
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • RSS
All sections

Search

Search pressgazette.co.uk

Close

Press Gazette

Subscribe to our email newsletter Journalism email newsletter
  • News
  • Comment
  • Data
  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Marketing
  • Awards
  • Jobs

Menu

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • National Newspapers
  • Regional Newspapers
  • Digital Journalism
  • Broadcast Journalism
  • Media Law
  • Magazines
  • Wires and Agencies
  • Obituaries
  • News
  • Comment/Analysis
  • Jobs
  • British Journalism Awards

In the news

  • Platforms
  • Publishers
  • Interviews
  • Marketing
Close
Former Observer editor calls Daily Mail's Paul Dacre ‘a very great man’ and 'newspaperman of genius' in Guardian letter
Associated Newspapers agrees to pay substantial libel damages to lawyer over 'devastating attack' on her reputation
June 12, 2018
  • Media Law
  •    
  • National Newspapers
  •    
  • News
  •    

Byline Media and journalist Peter Jukes pursue damages and apology after hacking allegations by Brexit campaigners

By Charlotte Tobitt Twitter

Share this

  • Tweet
  • Share 0
  • Reddit
Comments
2

Byline Media and its co-director Peter Jukes have demanded an apology and damages from two leading Brexit campaign figures over claims Sunday Times political editor Isabel Oakeshott’s emails were hacked.

Leave.EU donor Arron Banks and director of communications Andy Wigmore have repeatedly alleged that Byline, Jukes and Observer journalist Carole Cadwalladr had obtained hacked or stolen documents as the source of their story published this weekend detailing Banks’s links to Russian officials.

Timeline

  • March 22, 2019

    Byline team to rebrand and launch print title for subscribers in telling stories others 'have ignored'

  • September 13, 2018

    Impress dismisses complaint by child sex abuse victim named without consent in Byline article

  • February 8, 2018

    Former Exaro editor dubs Impress 'a shambles' after ruling against his Ted Heath article on Byline

Both journalists have repeatedly denied the allegations on Twitter.  Cadwalladr told Press Gazette yesterday: “We had received some material that we knew came from a perfectly legitimate source and it was somebody who thought that it desperately had to be out in the public domain.”

A Guardian News and Media spokesperson told Press Gazette today it is not currently pursuing any accompanying legal action but is monitoring the situation. “GNM stands by its reporting,” they added.

After Banks and Wigmore repeated the allegation numerous times on Twitter between Saturday and yesterday, Bindmans law firm last night wrote on behalf of Byline and Jukes (pictured) to Mishcon de Reya under pre-action protocol for defamation.

The legal letter states that they obtained the information for publication, including copies of Banks’s emails, from a confidential source who had obtained the emails “entirely lawfully” in November last year.

The letter said: “For the avoidance of doubt we should also make it absolutely clear to your clients that the allegation that our clients knowingly received hacked or stolen information is also false.

“As journalists, there are obviously times when it is appropriate to publish information that was originally obtained unlawfully. However, this is not what happened.”

The letter pointed to a number of tweets in particular, including Banks saying on Saturday that the Observer’s story was obtained from emails stolen from Oakeshott, and Wigmore retweeting it and adding: “Hacked emails tut tut.”

On Sunday Banks tweeted that he was told by Oakeshott that her emails were hacked by Byline and the Guardian and that they were using stolen information.

Oakeshott has posted a screenshot of an email proving that her Dropbox account was improperly accessed but Byline’s lawyers said they had nothing to do with any attempt to access this account.

“They did not steal any information from anyone,” the letter said.

“They were assured, and believe, that the information they received was not accessed unlawfully and the circumstances in which it was provided to them (which are confidential) support that belief.

“They were presented with material of potentially immense public importance, which had a clear provenance, and they therefore published it.”

Byline said that the allegations of hacking, or commissioning others to hack or steal on their behalf, would be an exceptionally serious offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 and/or the Theft Act, and therefore reached the serious harm threshold under the Defamation Act 2013.

They also claimed the repeated tweeting of false allegations was an “intimidatory tactic, designed to cause our clients alarm and distress”, making it a breach of the Protection from Harassment Act 1999.

Byline and Jukes requested that Banks and Wigmore publish a retraction and apology in terms to be agreed; pay a sum in damages; compensate them for legal costs; and agree not to repeat the allegations any further.

“Should you agree to these steps, our clients will take the matter no further,” the letter said.

“If not, our clients reserve the right to issue proceedings against yours with no further notice.”

They also said the relevant tweets should be removed immediately, with a retraction published.

Mishcon de Reya has not responded to requests for comment.

But after Byline tweeted to say that a solicitor’s letter was on its way, Banks responded: “Hold on, I thought you believed in freedom and transparency Carole Cadwalladr and not hiding behind lawyers, no ?”

The Observer’s Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Christopher Wylie has also denied any involvement in illegally obtaining the documents.

Wyle said on Twitter today: “To be clear, I did not steal ‘hacked’ emails from Arron Banks.

“I was shown them and I then reported Mr Banks and Mr Wigmore to the authorities because it was concerning that Leave.EU officials were in discussions about Brexit and large financial deals with the Russian ambassador.”

SIGN UP HERE FOR

MEDIA MONITOR

Press Gazette's weekly email providing strategic insight into the future of the media

Subscribe

Related Stories

  • Arron Banks drops part of libel case against Observer's Carole Cadwalladr
  • Carole Cadwalladr will defend 'true' claims about Brexiteer Arron Banks in libel battle
  • Byline team to rebrand and launch print title for subscribers in telling stories others 'have ignored'
  • How The Sunday Times spoiled Observer's Arron Banks Russia connection scoop

Explore these topics

  • Byline
  • Defamation Act
  • Guardian News and Media
  • Peter Jukes
  • The Observer
Browse, search and add journalism jobs
Comments

2 thoughts on “Byline Media and journalist Peter Jukes pursue damages and apology after hacking allegations by Brexit campaigners”

  1. Lapsley says:
    June 13, 2018 at 7:29 am

    Out of interest, hasn’t Byline been working with John Ford, arch Fleet Street blagger? They did a big lengthy piece with him in March.

    And similarly appropos of nothing, wasn’t the Observer cited under Motorman as one of the worst newspapers in Fleet Street for blagging?

    Reply
  2. Alec24 says:
    June 13, 2018 at 7:22 am

    How do you explain that?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More content

Post a job on Press Gazette

Most Popular

  1. Journalism after Trump Journalism after Trump: Why facts are now more important than arguments
  2. New York Times third-party cookies New York Ties Interview: New York Times explains the in-house adtech it is using to prepare for the death of third-party cookies
  3. cookies Enter Sandbox: How Google is building an internet without cookies - and why publishers are concerned
  4. NewsNow Facebook Facebook removes UK aggregator NewsNow's page without warning or explanation
  5. GB News launch: Why advertisers are positive about new anchor-led news channel for UK

Latest Jobs

  • Global Witness logo investigative journalist job Investigation Officer (Forests), Global Witness
  • Editor in Chief, Scottish Sun
  • Features Producer, Economist Radio
Associated Newspapers agrees to pay substantial libel damages to lawyer over 'devastating attack' on her reputation

© copyright 2021 Press Gazette Ltd. Made in Taiwan.