View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
November 6, 2006updated 22 Nov 2022 9:42pm

Brit restaurant critics reviewed by New York Sunday Times

By Press Gazette

 

 

Are British restaurant critics better than their American counterparts? Or just noisier and more cantankerous? That’s the question posed this week by the New York Sunday Times. To start, American restaurant reviewers in the main seek anonymity. They don’t usually give their real names when they make restaurant bookings. Unlike many British reviewers they don’t use their pictures on their columns. And they certainly don’t as some British critics have been known to do – pose for pictures with a restaurant owner or chef they may even be criticising.

 

 

That according to the author of the NY Times critique, Sarah Lyall, is one of the major difference in restaurant reviewing in Britain and the US. It’s true that most restaurant owners, or chefs, know when there is critic in the restaurant – but the critics usually don’t go out of the way to make their presence known. . And they don’t, its claimed, ask for special attention. In New York, Chicago and San Francisco, the author claims, restaurant reviewing is a decorous and serious business

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

 

 

She cites some extreme examples of what can happen in Britain. Such as the time when Michael Winner of the Sunday Times, upset by the Yorkshire pudding that was served to him in Claridges, (“so dried up it needed a hammer” , he claimed) that he demanded the maitre d’ wrap it up and threatened to send it to the chairman of The Savoy Group

 

 

One of the problems in Britain it is suggested is that many restaurant critics see themselves not as consumer advocates but as entertainers who have to keep their readers amused – or at least stand out from their rivals.

 

 

The title of most notorious British critic is awarded to A.A.Gill of the Sunday Times.

 

Most chefs know what he looks like, if only because of his monocle and fearsome appearance, So they know when he is in their restaurant, says the NY Sunday Times, His reviews however .tend to be discursive essays – with just a few paragraphs about the restaurant itself. Tiffanie Dark, editor of the Sunday Times Style section in which Gill’s reviews are published, by way of explanation, said that he had been writing the reviews for more than a decade and if he only wrote about food every week, he would bore his readers rigid.

 

 

The question posed in the NY Times nevertheless is whether critics with such outsize public images can really claim to be impartial judges? One British public relations expert in the restaurant field, Maureen Mills, who represents several leading British restaurants, suggested that even off-the-topic reviewers can be important to a restaurant. In other words just make sure you spell the name (and the address) right. Even a bad review by Michael Winner, whom she described, boldly for someone in public relations, as an “opinionated old man”, is she claimed welcomed by many restaurants. Winner himself, the NY Times Magazine reported, had no comment!

 

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network