Watchdog set up to oversee police use of new spying powers

Spying powers used by police, intelligence agencies and other public authorities will be scrutinised by a newly-created watchdog from Friday.

Lord Justice Fulford was appointed as the UK’s first Investigatory Powers Commissioner in March.

The position was created as part of a strengthened oversight regime in the landmark Investigatory Powers Act, which passed into law last year.

The new law builds on changes to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) which were passed by Parliament in March 2015 after the Press Gazette Save Our Sources campaign.

RIPA was most notoriously used to find and punish police officers who gave information to The Sun about the Plebgate affair of September 2012.

It has also been used unlawfully by Cleveland Police force to grab call data from journalists in a bid to find the source of leaks to the press.

Supported by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO), Lord Justice Fulford will oversee the use of tactics such as bulk collection of communications data and interception of emails and phone calls.

The move brings the oversight regime under one umbrella, after it was previously split between three different bodies.

The IPCO will inspect hundreds of public authorities each year, including intelligence services, law enforcement agencies, local authorities and prisons.

A “double lock” regime will be introduced for the most intrusive techniques, so that warrants issued by a Secretary of State will now require the approval of a senior judge.

This measure will be brought into force incrementally over the next year and once it has started, judicial commissioners will consider whether they agree with ministers’ decisions to authorise the use of intrusive investigatory powers. Commissioners will have the power to refuse warrants.

Lord Justice Fulford said:”From today, and for the first time, investigatory powers will be overseen by a single body applying a consistent, rigorous and independent inspection regime across public authorities.

“This is an important milestone as we start to implement the new oversight powers set out in the Investigatory Powers Act.”

The Act was drawn up to bring a host of techniques used by security services, police and other authorities into one legal regime.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd said the Act offers a “world-leading oversight regime”.

She added: “In commencing his oversight responsibility, Lord Justice Fulford is playing a vital role in providing the enhanced safeguards we set out in the Act.”

Picture: Pixabay

Comments

2 thoughts on “Watchdog set up to oversee police use of new spying powers”

  1. It’s all very well for some people to say ‘good riddance’ but the loss of local papers and the day-to-day groundwork done by reporters is going to mean a serious and worrying gap in local democracy.

    Without us here to hold councils/hospital trusts, local politicians and other official bodies to account, or report the courts, or reflect the community back to people, who is going to do it?

    We all know the nationals and broadcast media use our local papers – or ‘rags’ as one of the commentators has described us – to provide a much wider check on the authorities and without local papers, this is going to be missing.

    Celebrate the loss of local papers at your peril.

    1. Lance:

      Digital will fill, and is filling, that void left by local newspaper closures. Newspapers do not have comment sections and decision about what prints is controlled by a tiny number of individuals. Hardly a robust system of holding local authorities to account. Ripe for corruption and turning a blind eye more like it.

      Digital platforms have comment sections, you get to hear multiple perspectives, get to correct and inform in real-time. Far more effective.

      And there is no reason why digital platforms will not arise and take the place of local print outlets. In my own hometown this is already taking place and no doubt is nationwide.

      Your concern that local authorities will not be held to account is objectively wrong and misguided. Quite the contrary will happen – now more than ever before we have a way to have a genuine and open dialogue and full transparency.

      Print media being replaced by real-time digital media is a wonderful thing because it cannot be controlled and manipulated behind closed doors any longer.

Leave a Reply to Jess Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

twelve − one =

CLOSE
CLOSE