View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
May 25, 2011

Wakeham blames HR Act for privacy ‘shambles’

By Andrew Pugh

Former chairman of the Press Complaints Commission Lord Wakeham has blamed the Human Rights Act for the current ‘shambles’on privacy – and claimed it should be amended to allow the PCC to ‘reassert its primacy”.

In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, Lord Wakeham claimed to have predicted the current ‘intolerable state of affairs’when the Human Rights Act made its way through Parliament in the late 1990s.

Wakeham, who chaired the Press Complaints Commission from 1995 to 2001, said it was clear to him that ‘because Parliament was relinquishing control of the issue, the resulting law would inevitably go further than we wished”.

‘Section 12 of the Human Rights Act attempted to enshrine in law the PCC’s common sense Code of Practice which protects an individual’s right to privacy as well as defining the public interest which justifies intrusion, with a view to cases being sorted out by the Commission and not the courts,’said Wakeham.

‘It has clearly failed to deliver that goal and the problem needs urgently addressing.’

Wakeham’s solution is to amend the Human Rights Act limiting the role of the courts to dealing with issues that impact only on public authorities and the state, which he claimed the original drafters of the European Convention on Human Rights had intended.

He added: ‘That would leave the media outside the direct supervision of the courts on privacy issues and enable the PCC – which can react much more swiftly to changes in newspaper technology than the law will ever be able to do so – to reassert its primacy in this area, as Parliament always intended.”

Content from our partners
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution

Wakeham claimed the recent spate of injunctions was down to the fact that in privacy matters – unlike in libel – the courts ‘inevitably err on the side of the applicant when considering whether to grant an injunction, and not on the side of a newspaper”.

‘That is the root of the inherent ‘unfairness’ the Prime Minister referred to, and why this shambles has arisen,’he added.

On Monday, Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC announced a new joint Lords and Commons committee will be set up to examine issues around privacy.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network