View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
February 26, 2004updated 22 Nov 2022 1:32pm

The right to share – to a certain extent

By Press Gazette

 

Just how far should the right to tell your story extend when minors are involved? Mr Justice Munby has recently offered guidance on limitations that may appropriately be employed in the case of Re Roddy (a child) [2004] All ER (D) 150 (Feb).

The case centred on a girl who became pregnant aged 12. The father was of a similar age. The local authority began care proceedings in relation to the mother and, after the birth, the child. A series of injunctions was granted to protect their identities.

A few years later, on the mother’s application, the care order relating to her was discharged. The mother then approached a national newspaper with the intention of sharing her experiences in the care system. Consequently, the newspaper’s solicitors contacted the local authority giving notice of their client’s intention to apply for a variation of the injunction. The local authority raised concerns in relation to the identification of the child.

The court had to consider the right to freedom of expression enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights – not only that of the press and of readers, but also the right of the mother to tell her story.

Additionally, the court noted that the right to privacy enshrined in Article 8 of the Convention embraced not only maintenance of privacy, but also the right to share one’s otherwise private history with others. It was the court’s responsibility and duty to defend the right of a child (the mother), who had sufficient understanding to make an informed decision, to make her own choice.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

However, an injunction would be granted to preserve her child’s anonymity. In the case of the father, the balance also required preservation of his anonymity, but not prevention of his story being told anonymously.

Therefore this case illustrates the balance that must be struck between the freedom to tell one’s story, the freedom of the press to publish it and, naturally, the protection of children.

Ruth Moss is a lawyer in the technology, media and communications department at Lovells

Ruth Moss

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network