View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
January 27, 2010

Terror suspects named after Supreme Court challenge

By Dominic Ponsford

Four terror suspects who were appealing against asset-freezing orders can today be named after media organisations lodged a successful challenge to the Supreme Court.

The Justices said “never was the slightest justification” for the order adding that “the courts below appeared to have granted anonymity orders without any very prolonged consideration and without explaining their thinking”.

Media organisations challenging the order included: Guardian News and Media, Times Newspapers, the Associated Press, Bloomberg News, Index on Censorship, Dow Jones, The Economist, Article 19 and the Media Legal Defence Initiative.

One of the men was earlier named as Mohammed al-Ghabra after he was identified through a Bank of England press release.

The media organisations applied through the Supreme Court to be able to name the other four.

Lord Rodger, who gave the judgment, said: “If newspapers can identify the people concerned, they may be able to give a more vivid and compelling account which will stimulate discussion about the use of freezing orders and their impact on the communities in which the individuals live. Concealing their identities simply casts a shadow over entire communities.”

Media lawyer Mark Stephens suggested that the ban on naming the children in the Edlington torture attack case should be lifted in the light of this judgment.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

He said: “It is overwhelmingly in the public interest that the press should investigate and explain the background to this brutal and tragic crime without being inhibited by orders requiring that the family must remain anonymous.

“No Court henceforth should grant an anonymity order in a significant case unless it is satisfied that the litigant, if identified, would be in serious danger of physical attack.

“Indeed, it was a complete outrage that doctors and social workers in that case should have also sought anonymity, until now, such has been the expectation of anonymity of even third parties.”

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network