View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Report: BBC must end ‘he said, she said’ approach to coverage of government statistics and scrutinise claims

By Dominic Ponsford

The BBC is guilty of quoting government statistics without holding them up to sufficient scrutiny, according to a report by commissioned by the BBC Trust.

The report also found that 73 per cent of statistical references in the news come from Conservative politicians.

The BBC Trust has commissioned an impartiality review into how the corporation presents facts and figures in its news stories.

It said its presenters should be in a better position to challenge numbers, especially when interviewing guests.

“We came across many examples where statistics were used erroneously or in misleading ways by guests on programmes and were not challenged by presenters,” the report said.

And it said that audiences were unsatisfied with statistical claims being pitched against one another in a “he said, she said” format “without providing any kind of ‘refereeing’ voice”.

It also said that the BBC must do more to challenge Government statistics “where necessary” before airing them, to ensure “the impartiality of the BBC’s coverage of political affairs is not affected”.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

It added that content analysis pointed to the high number of statistics from political figures – especially Conservative politicians – on the BBC.
There is an “especially high number of political figures providing statistical information on the BBC … and Conservative politicians represented nearly three quarters (73 per cent) of these statistical references”.

Cardiff University, which analysed BBC coverage last winter, said it “shows a high dependence on the governing party”.

The report said: “It is reasonable to expect the BBC to cover statements which the UK or devolved governments make.

“However … it does make it vital that those statements are challenged where necessary so that the impartiality of the BBC’s coverage of political affairs is not affected.”

The report cited examples where the BBC could have done more to challenge numbers.

Then-prime minister David Cameron’s statement that 43 per cent of EU migrants claimed benefits in their first four years in the UK was in “many instances” … “quoted by government sources in BBC content without challenge on any fundamental level by journalists” despite reservations about the methodology behind the figure before it was used by Cameron.
Earlier this year, the BBC reported that nearly 3,000 operations had been cancelled over the junior doctors’ strike.

It was “well over an hour” into the BBC’s Breakfast programme before it provided context that 92 per cent of operations would go ahead as normal.
Early reporting by the BBC sometimes included “scant context around this statistic”, the report said.

Former UK national statistician Dame Jil Matheson, who led the report, said BBC journalists often said they lacked confidence with numbers.
She said she was not surprised that so many statistics on the BBC came from the government as she would “expect the BBC to be reporting on what the government of the day was up to”.

“But I think that that it does put an extra responsibility on the BBC … to go beneath the headlines,” she said.

There was “much to be commended in the BBC’s approach to statistics” and the values of accuracy and impartiality were clear, she said.
But “we were frustrated that the same high standards weren’t consistently applied”.

She said the BBC had to do more to challenge statistics “when they’re being used in a misleading way”.

And “audiences need guidance on understanding the weight of evidence rather than being left unguided in what can seem to be confusing and conflicting statistical claims … the BBC needs to get better and braver at doing that”.

As a result of the report, the BBC’s Reality Check – a regular analysis of competing claims which began during the last general election campaign – will be made a permanent feature and new training will be given to BBC News staff.

BBC head of news James Harding said: ”

James Harding, Director of BBC News & Current Affairs said: “Dame Jil’s hugely valuable report makes clear we’re the best at reporting statistics, but we’ve got work to do.  More than ever, people look to us at the BBC to check the facts and put the numbers in context.

“Reality Check, the team set up to assess political claims and assertions during the General Election and the Scottish and EU referendums, will now become a permanent part of the BBC newsroom.  The team will give programmes and presenters regular analysis to ensure that misleading use of statistics continues to be forcefully challenged on air.  And we are establishing a new reporting hub that aims to lead the way in data journalism.

“All of us in BBC News are grateful to Dame Jil and her team for the thoughtful work that has gone into considering one of the most important areas of modern reporting.”

Read the report: Making Sense of Statistics in full

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network