View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
December 18, 2003updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Posed prostitute picture misled readers

By Press Gazette

A “misleading” photograph of a prostitute standing on a street corner published by Luton on Sunday contravened the Editors’ Code of Practice.

The Press Complaints Commission has upheld a complaint about a picture which appeared on 12 October under the headline “Vice girls move into High Town”.

The complainant said the photograph, which accompanied an article about the increasing problem of prostitution in Luton, was misleading because it was not a real scene.

The image showed a street corner and a supposed vice girl on the pavement.

The complainant said the picture had either been posed or put together as an amalgam of two separate images.

The newspaper acknowledged that the photograph had been created from two separate images with a woman posing as a prostitute. The use of an illustrative photograph was quite legitimate in these circumstances, the newspaper argued, even if it did not show a real-life scene.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Clause one of the code states that newspapers and magazines must not publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted material including pictures.

In its adjudication the PCC said: “There was nothing to indicate to readers that the scene had been posed and, given that the subject matter concerned an important matter of local public interest, we considered that the newspaper should have taken greater care – for instance by publishing a suitable caption – to ensure that readers were not misled.”

The commission has reminded editors they must make clear when photographs have been altered.

A statement said: “If they are unsure about whether their changes are significant they should incline towards transparency and declare that the image has been altered or artificially assembled, as the newspaper should have done on this occasion.

“Although in this case the breach of the code was not particularly grave, it raised a point of principle to which the commission attaches high importance.”

By Dominic Ponsford

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network