View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
June 25, 2013updated 28 Jun 2013 8:42pm

PCC figures suggest slight improvement in behaviour of the press in 2012

By Dominic Ponsford

Press Complaints Commission figures for 2012 suggest a slight improvement in overall press behaviour compared with the previous year.

There was a reduction in the number of critical adjudications published by the watchdog and in the number of cases, including those involving media scrums, where pre-publication help was sought  from the body.

Overall, the PCC found that there were 649 complaints which it judged to have 'merit' (which raised a likely breach of the Editors' Code), compared with 719 such complaints in 2011.

The PCC received some 12,191 complaints in 2012, compared with 7,300 in 2011. The large increase in the total was partly down to The Sun’s decision to publish a picture of a naked Prince Harry on its front page – which attracted some 3,800 complaints alone. No ruling was issued because Prince Harry chose not to complain.

The PCC issued rulings or brokered resolutions in 1,937 cases (versus 1,713 in 2011).

There were 101 complaints where the Editors’ Code had been breached and the publication had taken sufficient action to remedy the breach (compared with 102 such cases in 2011).

There were a further 13 cases were publications had seriously breached the Editors’ Code prompting the PCC to issue critical public rulings (compared with 20 such cases in 2011). Some 535 cases were resolved by mediation.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Of the 1,937 cases the commission dealt with, it found that on 1,274 occasions there had been no breach of the Editors' Code.

Members of the public complaining about harassment, intrusion and inaccuracy on a pre-publication basis were assisted by the PCC 136 times in 2012, compared with 157 such instances in 2011. This included issuing ‘desist’ notices to editors were complainants were concerned about media ‘scrums’ gathering outside their homes.

Complaints by type:

  • 92.6 per cent  – Accuracy & Opportunity to reply (Clauses 1 & 2)
  • 40.9 per cent – Privacy issues (Clauses 3 – 9 & 11)
  • 1.8 per cent – Subterfuge (Clause 10)
  • 2.3 per cent – Discrimination (Clause 12)
  • 0.06 per cent – Others (Clauses 13-16)

Complaints by sector:

(Where investigation by the PCC was warranted i.e. the PCC requested a response from the relevant editor because the complaint appeared to raise a possible breach of the Code)

  • 49.4 per cent – National newspapers
  • 33.7 per cent – Regional and local newspapers
  • 11 per cent – Scottish newspapers
  • 2 per cent – Irish newspapers
  • 2.9 per cent – Magazines
  • 0.1 per cent – Press agencies
  • 0.1 per cent – Publications not subscribing to the self-regulatory system

The PCC said that in 2012, 96.1 per cent of PCC-negotiated corrections were published no later than five pages further back than the material complained of, or in a dedicated corrections column.

Some 371 complainants responded to a PCC survey in 2012. Of these, 78 per cent said they “felt that taking everything into account about the service provided by the PCC that their case had been handled satisfactorily, well or very well”.

PCC chairman Lord Hunt said: “I have always made clear that the present system of press self-regulation needs to change. The evidence to the Leveson Inquiry showed the need for a genuine regulator with a new remit, strong investigative powers and robust, meaningful sanctions.

“Whilst we continue to move towards the construction of a new regulator, the PCC’s valuable complaints and pre-publication services remain available to the public. Last year’s figures testify to the thousands of people who have been offered practical help by the PCC’s committed staff, round the clock, and entirely for free.

“Significant reform of press regulation is needed, and will be delivered. These existing services should be preserved and built on as the new regulator that is desperately needed in the UK is constructed.”

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network