View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. News
September 16, 2010updated 17 Sep 2010 3:05pm

Newspaper Society claims new law could limit Family Court reporting

By admin

The Newspaper Society has complained that the Children, Schools & Families Act 2010 will not succeed in delivering its aims of greater accountability, openness and transparency.

The body which represents the regional publishing industry made the claim as part of its submission to the Justice Select Committee’s inquiry into the operation of the family courts.

The NS claims the previous Government’s move to open up the family court to greater public scrutiny was warmly supported by the media but regretfully it has concluded that the Act will not achieve this aim.

‘In the final event the Act became the vehicle for a regime which not only ensured total anonymity for all those involved, thus completely defeating the objective of greater accountability of those involved in the system, but which also, if brought into effect in its present form, will arguably place greater restriction upon the media’s ability to report than is presently the case.”

The NS points out that the Act’s effect is apparently to make it a contempt of court to publish any article referring to family proceedings, even if derived entirely from material already in the public domain, and even if the parties were not identified, if the publication was not derived from an ‘authorised news report”.

As a result, the NS said, the ‘highly commendable’aim of opening up the courts was sidetracked by ‘the intense pressure exerted by some of those involved in the family justice system to build into the Bill extensive and automatic reporting restrictions.”

It concludes: ‘The intention of increased transparency has been lost in the Act’s drafting, that the aim of achieving privacy for the families has been conflated into a renewed regime of secrecy  which – if the relevant provisions in the Act are brought into force unamended – will not only fail to deliver the desired public accountability but will represent a major reduction in what can now be lawfully published, and will actually further reduce public debate and discussion of the family justice system.”

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network