View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
April 1, 2004updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Nail facing lion’s share of legal bill

By Press Gazette

Actor and singer Jimmy Nail has been left facing a possible legal bill of up to £200,000 after a judge awarded him less than he was seeking in a libel action over alleged “obscene and depraved sexual behaviour”.

Mr Justice Eady said Nail’s claim was “disproportionate” when measured against the sums awarded to victims of personal injuries, such as brain damage.

He awarded the Auf Wiedersehen Pet star only £30,000 damages in his libel action over allegations in an unauthorised biography in 1998 and in the News of the World four years later.

Nail had claimed up to £100,000 over the allegations that he had taken part in secret bondage orgies.

Book publisher HarperCollins and News Group Newspapers paid £37,000 into court in an effort to settle the case ahead of the hearing.

They say this will leave Nail to pay the lion’s share of the costs, although the exact division of the estimated £200,000 total lawyers’ bill is to be decided at a later hearing.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Nail had claimed in the witness box that he was left “sick to the pit of my stomach” when he saw the headline “Auf Wiedersehen Jim’s secret bondage orgies” in his local newsagent. He told the High Court how, even though he knew the allegations, taken from Geraint Jones’s 1998 book Nailed: The Biography of Jimmy Nail, were false, he was made to feel like “some kind of sexually debased beast”.

The publisher had already accepted that the allegations were untrue, and apologised, but the case went to court on the issue of how much Nail should receive in damages.

Awarding him only £22,500 in respect of the newspaper article, and £7,500 in respect of the unauthorised biography, Mr Justice Eady said: “The impact of Sunday tabloid coverage can be very frightening and disorienting.

“Nevertheless, the range of damages sought by the claimant’s solicitors was very high. It was put at between £70,000 and £100,000. One only has to test it against the sort of personal injuries that would attract such an award to see that it would be disproportionate.”

By Roger Pearson

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network