View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
November 7, 2011

Majority of barristers favour cameras in court

By PA Mediapoint

The majority of barristers are in favour of the Justice Secretary’s plans to lift the ban on filming in courts provided there are safeguards in place for witnesses and jurors, a study has found

Almost two in three barristers agree that cameras should be allowed into courts for appeals and criminal trials in England and Wales, a survey of more than 700 barristers conducted by The Times and Bar Council showed.

According to The Times, when asked whether cameras should be allowed in criminal trials, 40 per cent of barristers said no; 24 per cent said yes and not only for sentencing remarks; 21 per cent said yes but not showing jurors or witnesses; and 9 per cent said yes but not showing jurors.

Earlier this year Kenneth Clarke announced he will overturn the 85-year ban on filming in courts as part of “unprecedented plans to improve transparency”.

It will be the first time cameras have been allowed in courts other than the Supreme Court since filming was banned by the Criminal Justice Act 1925.

Only judges’ remarks will be shown – not those of victims, witnesses, offenders or jurors.

Peter Lodder, QC, chairman of the Bar, said: “I am not surprised by the findings of the survey. However it endorses the importance of ensuring that witnesses, who already find giving evidence an ordeal are protected.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

“People are unnerved about going to court. If they feel that by going to court they are also going to be filmed, there is a significant risk that they will not go at all.”

He added: “Public trust in the criminal justice system may be enhanced by the broadcasting of sentencing remarks. All sentencing decisions are explained fully, but the full extent of the judge’s remarks is often unreported.”

Clarke said in September that a consultation process involving the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge would take place to ensure the move “does not hinder the administration of justice and that it protects victims, witnesses, offenders and jurors”.

But Tory MP Roger Gale said it risked turning justice into a reality show and providing a platform for “eccentric” legal professionals.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network