View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
April 8, 2016

Journalists confused after being told by Tory MPs that ‘snooper’s charter’ will ‘bolster protections’ for sources

By Dominic Ponsford

Various Conservative MPs have repeated an apparent cut-and-paste response to concerns raised by journalists about the Draft Investigatory Powers Bill.
The National Union of Journalists has encouraged its members to write to their MPs raising concerns that the bill does not provide adequate safeguards for confidential journalistic sources.
At least half a dozen MPs, including Home Secretary Theresa May, have written back repeating the same line: "Protections for lawyers and journalists have been bolstered".
The draft bill states that law enforcement authorities must seek approval of a judicial commissioner for requests to see telecoms records which are sought to identify a journalistic source.
But the NUJ, in common with most other media organisations, believes these protections do not go far enough.
The union is concerned that the bill contains no requirement to notify a journalist about communications access results, no right to challenge or appeal a decision to access journalists’ communications and no open judicial authorisation process.
NUJ member Brian Samuel said: "I wrote to my MP, James Cleverly, about this bill but I was disappointed that the reply I received did not seem to recognise that there were any dangers to press freedom. In fact he suggested that journalistic protection would be bolstered by it."
Another, Mark Kitchen, said: “The reply I received from the Home Secretary regarding my concerns over the Investigatory Powers Bill states that 'Protections for lawyers and journalists have been bolstered'. Unfortunately, there is no detail at all on the how this has been achieved. In fact, the letter fails to address any of the issues I raised and seems very much to be a standard response on the subject.”
On Monday 11 April the Speak in Safety campaign is hosting an event in Parliament, chaired by Joanna Cherry QC MP, to persuade MPs and Lords that more caution is needed over this bill. Relevant clauses in the Bill are up for debate at committee stage the next day.
Headed by the NUJ, the Bar Council and the Law Society, Speak in Safety campaigners are calling on parliamentarians to support amendments to the Investigatory Powers Bill.
Opposition MPs have tabled amendments to the legislation which seek to provide greater protections for journalists and their sources from state snooping.
NUJ general secretary Michelle Stanistreet said: “The current proposals contained in the investigatory powers bill are a risk to all journalists, journalistic sources and whistleblowers.
“The draft law must be changed to guarantee press freedom and enable journalistic sources and whistleblowers to speak in safety.”
The Speak in Safety event takes place on Monday 11 April, 17.00-18.30, in Committee Room 11, Houses of Parliament.
Those wishing to attend should email: sarahk@nuj.org.uk.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Topics in this article : ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network