View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
April 21, 2010

Irish Mail beats first gag bid under new defamation act

By PA Media Lawyer

The Irish Mail on Sunday has beaten an attempt to gag it from reporting allegations that a charity founder made inappropriate sexual advances to males in Kenya.

Michael Meegan had sought a non-publication order from the High Court in Dublin under Ireland’s new Defamation Act.

Meegan, who holds a British passport, helped to establish a charity called Icross – the International Community for the Relief of Starvation and Suffering – and had sought to stop the Irish Mail on Sunday publishing an article alleging that he had made advances to Kenyan men or youths – claims that he denied.

He also sought an order prohibiting the paper from breaching his right to privacy over his sexuality.

The application is believed to be the first to have been made since the Act came into force on New Year’s Day.

Section 33 (1) of the Act says: “The High Court, or where a defamation action has been brought, the court in which it was brought, may, upon the application of the plaintiff, make an order prohibiting the publication or further publication of the statement in respect of which the application was made if in its opinion – (a) the statement is defamatory, and (b) the defendant has no defence to the action that is reasonably likely to succeed.”

The President of the High Court, Justice Nicholas Kearns, rejected Meegan’s application at a hearing on Monday, saying that said such a “draconian” measure would only be appropriate if the paper had no evidence to back up its case.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Kearns found that the newspaper had shown reasonable grounds for its claim that it might succeed at the trial of any libel action, and that there was no suggestion it would not be able to pay damages should any libel action succeed.

The judge said he was also taking into account an undertaking given by Sebastian Hamilton, the newspaper’s editor, that it would not now publish certain allegations.

Kearns refused to stay his decision pending an appeal to the Supreme Court and ordered Meegan to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Meegan’s lawyers confirmed last night that they would not be taking the case to the Supreme Court.

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network