View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

IPSO rejects complaint from sister of London Bridge attack pint runner over use of Facebook post

By Freddy Mayhew

A woman who shared a viral image of her brother calmly fleeing the London Bridge terror attack with a pint of beer has complained its use by three news websites breached the Editors’ Code.

Katherine Armstrong posted the image of Paul Armstrong on Facebook after it had been widely shared on social media in the aftermath of the fatal attack in June.

Armstrong “tagged” eight friends in the post to draw their attention to it.

It was picked up by a journalist friend of one of the eight and a story identifying the man first appeared in the Liverpool Echo before it was picked up by The Sun, Mirror and Metro websites.

The Metro and Mirror included comments from Armstrong’s post, which read: “So that guy with the pint? Yes, that’s the elusive Paul Armstrong. That’s what happens when you’re a Scouser paying London pint prices.”

Armstrong complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), which regulates all three titles, that their articles breached accuracy (1) and privacy (2) clauses in the Editors’ Code of Practice.

She claimed she had not shared her comments publicly, but acknowledged that up to 1,358 people may have been able to view the post on the social network.

Content from our partners
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution

The news websites all claimed they had based their reports on information published in another newspaper and so had not sourced it in a manner which had intruded into the complainant’s privacy.

There was no complaint made against the Echo at the time of writing.

Armstrong made the accuracy complaint on the grounds that she had been “speculating on the identity of the man pictured” at the time of writing the Facebook post. She said that while it had been reported accurately, no further steps were taken to verify her claim.

IPSO’s complaints committee ruled that “the fact the complainant’s brother was, or appeared to be, the person photographed, was not private information about her” and that her name had not been reported nor anything that identified their relationship.

IPSO also ruled that the “nature of the information and the manner in which it had been previously circulated” meant Armstrong did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to it.

The committee added that the websites had “accurately reported the complainant’s Facebook post” and made clear where claims had been made in another publication.

The complaint was not upheld.

IPSO does not rule on copyright issues.

Topics in this article : , , , ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network