View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
July 7, 2014updated 10 Jul 2014 1:07pm

How publishers can beat Google right to be forgotten rulings

By Cleland Thom

The Surrey Comet is one of several local newspapers to beat the EU’s ‘right to be forgotten’ ruling by running a story about a request to Google to remove this article from search results.

The paper revealed on Friday that a mystery person succeeded in getting the search engine to partially remove links to their archive.

The original article was about a college losing more than £400,000 on a fundraising concert.

After republishing the story it has now re-entered the search results – and has received a fresh blast of publicity.

The Comet has not yet discovered who made the take-down request. Google won’t say.

But other media can use the same tactic, provided they make legal checks.

I can foresee media websites running regular features like: "Today’s take-down requests: the stories people didn’t want you to see."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

If enough of them adopted this tactic, people would hesitate to issue take-down requests because they would be counter-productive.

If you’re consider using this tactic, it’s safest to just re-use the link.

But if you want to republish information from the archived article, make sure you do not:

1.   Repeat a libel.
2.   Include content from the original article that prejudices new court proceedings, or a retrial.
3.   Breach the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act by referring to a spent conviction.
4.   Breach the PCC code by republishing a story that was subject to an unfavourable adjudication.
5.   Refer to a ‘convict’ who has since been cleared on appeal.
6.   Name someone whose identity has since been restricted.
7.   Repeat facts from privileged copy that have subsequently changed.
8.   Re-publish old court copy, or privileged stories, ‘for the sake of it’. This could be seen as malicious.
9.   Insensitively repeat information about deaths, tragedies etc.
10. Breach copyright.
11. Contain personal information, unless there is a current public interest issue.

Cleland Thom is author of the new eBook: Internet law for journalists

Topics in this article : , ,

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network