Hacking test cases to determine 'who did what to whom'

Mr Justice Vos has said that he will use five more News of the World phone-hacking test cases to find out ‘what was agreed to be done, by whom, for what purpose, over what period and who was involved”.

He has already heard one case, involving actress Sienna Miller, which was provisionally settled by the News of the World’s offer of £100,000 in damages.

The other test cases – to be heard in January next year – are the privacy actions brought by actor Jude Law, agent Sky Andrew, interior designer Kelly Hoppen, football commentator Andy Gray and MP Chris Bryant.

The judge said the cases would enable him to decide the damages that were properly payable across a range of alleged factual situations, and make it possible for other cases to be resolved without the need for further hearings.

The actions have arisen following the disclosure of information by the Metropolitan Police and Vodafone relating to material from private detective Glenn Mulcaire who, with News of the World reporter Clive Goodman, was jailed in 2007 for listening the mobile-phone voicemail messages of royal aides.

The judge also named a second tier of claims, which will move up should any of the lead cases settle.

They are those of former MP George Galloway, footballer Paul Gascoigne, actor Steve Coogan, PR consultant Max Clifford’s former assistant Nicola Phillips, and model Elle Macpherson’s former adviser Mary-Ellen Field.

The judge said Andrew’s case was chosen as he was admitted in the criminal prosecution to have been the subject of interception, and was an example of someone about whom no article was published but who attracted interest because of the people he acted for.

Kelly Hoppen was significant because she was said to have been targeted over a lengthy period up until 2009, was the subject of 11 articles and was allegedly harassed.

Gray’s case was useful because it was admitted there was an article written about him as a result of a message he left, so the court would not have to determine whether material was obtained by normal journalistic methodss

He said there was “significant overlap” between the cases of Ms Hoppen and Jude Law, but there was also a significant difference in their profile and, without the actor, who complains about 16 articles, he might be left without anyone of “independent high profile”.

MP Chris Bryant should be included, he added, because a number of politicians had brought claims and the kind of damages involved in such cases were likely to be different.

Comments
No comments to display

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 − 1 =

CLOSE
CLOSE