View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
January 31, 2002updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Guardian hit by double damages

By Press Gazette

Alan Rusbridger and Guardian Newspapers have paid substantial damages to settle a second claim for libel over comments made by the paper’s editor about a previous libel victory for the director of a counselling service.

The case involved Graham Baldwin, the director of Catalyst, which specialises in therapy for victims of religious cults and similar groups.

The Guardian had published a report, headlined "Into a Shadowy World", on 23 January, 1997.

It alleged that Baldwin had broken a pledge to a Portuguese court, used false religious credentials and was involved in the de-programming of people who had come into contact with cults. Baldwin sued for libel on 20 November 1998, the jury found in his favour and he was awarded £15,000 in damages and costs.

The following day The Guardian published the outcome of the case when Rusbridger stated the newspaper’s intention to appeal (an intention that was not pursued) and defended his journalists, at the same time attacking the libel laws.

Solicitor-advocate David Price said Baldwin was highly aggrieved and considered Rusbridger was seeking to maintain the truth of the original article notwithstanding the jury’s verdict.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

"The libel proceedings had been highly stressful for the claimant and he had rightly regarded the vindication that he obtained from the jury as closing the matter.

"He was not prepared to allow the statement to remain unchallenged and he therefore brought these proceedings," said Price.

He added that the defendants had made it clear that it was never their intention to undermine the jury’s verdict nor to allege that the allegations published in the original article were true.

"They are to pay the costs of these proceedings, said Price, and publish in The Guardian a summary of a statement which was due to be made in the High Court this week, in accordance with the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Conduct.

"While the claimant would have preferred that the article had not been published, he accepts that he has achieved all that he can by bringing these proceedings and feels suitably vindicated," said Price.

"He is prepared now to let the matter rest."

By Roger Pearson

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network