View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
July 25, 2008

Family court lifts restrictions

By Roger Pearson

A Times journalist is to publish an interview with a man convicted in a controversial child abduction case after the country’s most senior family court judge made a highly unusual ruling to allow publication of certain details of ongoing care proceedings.

The long-running case had led to a mother to fleeing abroad with her son and the conviction of her new husband, the child’s stepfather, for abduction.

Sir Mark Potter, president of the High Court Family Division, approved the naming of Medway Council as the authority involved in the case, along with a summary of facts from previous court rulings.

He made the decision following an application by Times Newspapers for a declaration of how far it could go in reporting the case, saying that publication of the fuller story would ‘enable the public to form its own view of whether the actions of the council or the decisions of the court to date have been fairly characterised”.

He took the step in the wake of reports in several national newspapers acclaiming the pair as ‘heroes’and preventing Medway Council from ‘stealing’their child, and fighting the ‘secret justice’meted out by the courts in family cases.

The mother and child, known only as S, remain at large after leaving the country for France, where the mother gave birth to a second child by the child’s stepfather.

Name restrictions

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The stepfather, who cannot be named in order to avoid identification of the child and was referred to as M, returned to Britain and was sentenced to 16 months in prison in November 2007.

Articles published by Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and The Times criticised M’s sentence as excessive and charged that his case raised questions about the secrecy of the family court system.

Times columnist Camilla Cavendish, whose series of articles on the case spurred the application and were mentioned in the ruling (pictured right), welcomed the judge’s decision.

‘What this enables me to do is to pursue this story much more and hopefully use the story to show why the system just has to be changed.”

The decision will allow Cavendish to conduct an interview with M, who has since been released from prison, to tell part of his story.

‘I’ve written about this twice but in very guarded terms because the reporting restrictions were so onerous,’Cavendish told Press Gazette.

‘Almost anybody who had any knowledge of the case at all was gagged,’she said.

‘He is completely right to say that a lot of families in private proceedings with intimate family details don’t want those to come out. Our point isn’t that we want to remove confidentiality – we don’t need to name the individuals in order for the public to see the evidence.”

Challenging myths

‘Journalists are utterly distrusted by the judiciary and by most politicians,’she said. ‘Actually, I think they are wrong, because you can put sanctions in place. If you look at rape cases, those reporting restrictions are always honoured.”

The government is planning to publish a response to a consultation on access to family courts in the autumn.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network