View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Comment
August 27, 2013updated 29 Aug 2013 8:30pm

Employment Tribunals have new powers to ban reporting of any aspect of proceedings

By Cleland Thom

New rules restricting reports of Employment Tribunals have been introduced.

The Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 enable tribunals to make orders in a wider range of circumstances. 

They can now ban reporting of any aspects of the proceedings, either in the interests of justice or to protect someone’s human rights in cases involving:

a)     National security.

b)     Evidence that contains information that the witness cannot reveal without breaking a law or breaching a confidence.

c)     Information that could cause substantial injury to the employer’s interests in some circumstances.

The new orders go further than just restricting reports.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

They can force all or part of a hearing to be held in private, and suppress publication of the identities witnesses or other people involved in the case. They can also ban the reporting of specific details that could lead to someone’s identification.

The order can be passed before, or during a hearing, and the press can challenge it.

If an order is passed, it must be posted on the tribunal notice board and on the door of the room where it is taking place.

In the past, tribunals only had the power to sit in private in a) – c) above. And they were able to restrict the identities of people involved in sexual harassment or disability cases.

The press can challenge the new restrictions on a point of law, in the interests of justice, or to ensure freedom of expression under article 10 under the ECHR.

They must apply in writing, for permission to make the challenge. If consent is given, the challenge can be made in person or in writing.

Cleland Thom is a consultant in media law

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network