View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
January 31, 2002updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Dossier defeats bid to ban Theakston expose

By Press Gazette

People: argued for right to publish

The Sunday People took 21 cuttings on Jamie Theakston to a judge to back its claim that the TV presenter had put his private life in the public domain.

The cuttings, together with Mr Justice Ouseley’s contention that "it could not be considered confidential if you have sex with a prostitute in a brothel", helped the newspaper defeat an attempt last Saturday to  stop it from publishing a story about Theakston’s visit to a brothel.

The News of the World also ran a Theakston story, sympathetically slanted towards the presenter, saying he had never spoken about his private life.

"It is just not true," said People editor Neil Wallis. "He has talked about wild one-night stands he has had, what sort of woman he likes, how he has to be in love before he has a relationship with a woman.

"As the Press Complaints Commission has said frequently, you can’t put your public life in the arena when it suits you and then try to take it back out when it doesn’t.

"The judge laughed out of court the idea that having sex with a prostitute in a brothel could be considered confidential."

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

The story missed the People’s first edition as the newspaper argued at the judge’s home throughout Saturday afternoon that it should be allowed to publish.

However, the People’s handling of the story – going to Theakston early on Friday to put the story to him to give him the chance to dispute it – meant he was "able to run off to the courts under the Human Rights Act and try to injunct us", said Wallis.

"If we had just whacked it in the paper, I wouldn’t have had all this problem. All the arguments now are against us going to people anymore. We had made it clear to him we would listen sympathetically to anything he said.

"If we hadn’t put it to him we would have risked libel and he wouldn’t have had the chance to put his side of the argument."

The time factor also gave Theakston the opportunity to go to the NoW and tell his side of the story to the People’s rival.

 

By Jean Morgan

Topics in this article :

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network