View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Archive content
September 12, 2002updated 17 May 2007 11:30am

Debate in public, MPs tell secretive councils

By Press Gazette

Satchwell: "editors are concerned"

 

John Prescott is under pressure to free councils to take more key decisions in public following damning evidence that reporters are staying away from meetings which merely rubber stamp decisions already taken in private.

An influential cross-party committee of MPs has revealed that, instead of reviving interest in local government, the switch from the traditional committee to a cabinet system has led to fewer reporters and members of the public turning up for meetings.

"Our evidence suggests that in many councils, decisions continue to be made in private and are merely being rubber stamped or justified in public," the MPs said in a report to Parliament this week.

"Public awareness of who is taking decisions has not improved and public and media interest has, if anything, reduced," it said.

Content from our partners
Free journalism awards for journalists under 30: Deadline today
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition

Now the urban affairs committee, headed by Labour MP Andrew Bennett, has urged the Deputy Prime Minister to allow councils to define key or controversial decisions, instead of leaving it to Government guidance.

Under the new cabinet system key decisions must be publicised in advance, with relevant papers made available, and meetings held in public.

"What is controversial locally may be hard to predict nationally," the MPs told Prescott.

The committee’s report is timely. Local government minister Nick Raynsford has already promised the Government’s guidance will be reviewed this summer.

The committee’s move was welcomed by Bob Satchwell, executive director of the Society of Editors, which has argued that key decisions should be determined locally.

"This is not about the financial value of key decisions," Satchwell said. "It is how it affects the local community that is important."

Evidence that the press and public are ignoring meetings will be worrying for ministers who claimed that the Local Government Act would revive interest in the workings of local government.

Satchwell said: "We are disappointed that some councils may have used the act to reduce the flow of information.

"We have always warned that if councils want to be secretive the legislation would allow them to be.

Satchwell added: "Some papers are having no problems but I know some editors are concerned."

By David Rose

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network