View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

  1. Media Law
March 21, 2016updated 22 Mar 2016 2:06am

Debate on future of FoI told ‘use it or lose it’ and get information by being ‘a stubborn pain in the ass’

By Hardeep Singh

A debate on the future of the Freedom of Information Act was told "use it or lose it”.

The event at City University in London was held after news that the Government had backed down on proposals to water down the act by possibly imposing charges on requests and other restrictions.

Heather Brooke, who fought a five-year FoI battle to secure disclosure of MPs' expenses, said attempts to curb FoI had failed “because there is such a broad community of people who are using it now”, and she added: "It’s imperative on people to use it or lose it."

Asked about her general advice on making best use of the act, Brooke said: “The main advice is to just be a totally stubborn, tenacious pain in the ass to those people, because that’s what really wins the day.”

Guardian journalist Rob Evans, who fought an FoI battle which led to the disclosure of a series of Prince Charles’s so-called “black spider” letters to Ministers, told the debate: “The thing that saves the act is its got a broad base of use, lots of people are using it, and therefore they value it, and so when the government comes along and tries to attack it, people rally around and defend it.”   

TaxPayers’ Alliance chief executive Jonathan Isaby said he was delighted with the very broad coalition of journalists, campaigners and pressure groups who came together to fight for the FoI Act.

“I think that’s the point – a bit like Ronald Reagan said, ‘freedom is only one generation away from extinction’,” he said, “you’ve got to fight for it with each generation, and in our own way the same thing applies for FoI.”

Content from our partners
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it
Impress: Regulation, arbitration and complaints resolution

He added: “The TaxPayers’ Alliance takes the view that basically anything being done by politicians, bureaucrats or anyone in the public sector with tax payers’ money ought to be subject to the highest level of scrutiny.”

The debate at City University followed the announcement by Cabinet Office Minister Matt Hancock on 1 March that the Government had decided that it would not make any changes to FoI legislation as a review by an Independent Commission had found it to be “working well”.

Listen to an edited version of this event as a podcast:

Subscribe to the Press Gazette Journalism Matters podcast on iTunes

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network