View all newsletters
Sign up for our free email newsletters

Fighting for quality news media in the digital age.

Daily Telegraph to publish complete MP expenses list

By Paul McNally

The Daily Telegraph has announced it will round off a month of reports on MPs’ expenses by publishing the full list this weekend.

A 68-page supplement, called The Complete Expenses Files, will come with Saturday’s edition of the paper, listing the expenses of all 646 MPs.

“Inside the 68-page magazine supplement you will find files concerning all 646 MPs, with details of their Additional Costs Allowance (ACA) expenses for 2007-8, the most recent year for which figures are available,” the paper said today.

“This is the first time that such detailed information about our elected representatives has been available in one place.

“It is an historic moment. We believe that our expenses files will help change the face of British politics for the better.”

A small team of journalists working in a “bunker” based away from the main Telegraph newsroom have been analysing the leaked expenses details since 8 May.

The paper has refused to say whether – or how much – it paid for the leak, which added 2.3 per cent to its average daily circulation last month, according to ABC.

Content from our partners
MHP Group's 30 To Watch awards for young journalists open for entries
How PA Media is helping newspapers make the digital transition
Publishing on the open web is broken, how generative AI could help fix it

Saturday’s supplement comes after the House of Commons finally published details of the claims this morning – but with much of the detail that led to a public outcry blacked out.

Maurice Frankel, director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, said he was disappointed with the level of redaction that had been carried out by the Commons authorities.

He said the edited receipts would have made it impossible to detect the most serious abuses revealed by the Telegraph in recent weeks.

“Last year an amendment to the Freedom of Information Act removed information relating to MPs’ residential addresses from the Act’s scope,” he said.

“This was explained as a measure to protect MPs’ privacy and safety. But it also prevented the ‘flipping’ of second homes being detected.

“The House of Commons could have overcome this problem, without jeopardising MPs’ safety, by providing a partial postcode or by indicating when an address had changed, but this was not done.”

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our "Letters Page" blog

Select and enter your email address Weekly insight into the big strategic issues affecting the future of the news industry. Essential reading for media leaders every Thursday. Your morning brew of news about the world of news from Press Gazette and elsewhere in the media. Sent at around 10am UK time. Our weekly does of strategic insight about the future of news media aimed at US readers. A fortnightly update from the front-line of news and advertising. Aimed at marketers and those involved in the advertising industry.
  • Business owner/co-owner
  • CEO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • CTO
  • Chairperson
  • Non-Exec Director
  • Other C-Suite
  • Managing Director
  • President/Partner
  • Senior Executive/SVP or Corporate VP or equivalent
  • Director or equivalent
  • Group or Senior Manager
  • Head of Department/Function
  • Manager
  • Non-manager
  • Retired
  • Other
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
Thank you

Thanks for subscribing.

Websites in our network